Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-0084 (PLF) ) CODY PAGE CARTER CONNELL and +) DANIEL PAGE ADAMS, ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 22, 2025, the Court entered an Order denying the United States’ Motion to Dismiss Indictment with Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a) (“Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 180]. This Memorandum Opinion further explains the Court’s reasoning. I. BACKGROUND A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Vv. ) Criminal No. 21-0084 (PLF) ) CODY PAGE CARTER CONNELL and __) DANIEL PAGE ADAMS, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER The Joint Defense Motion to Continue Sentencing [Dkt. No. 155] is DENIED. Whatever the President-elect may or may not do with respect to some of those convicted for their conduct at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, is irrelevant to the Court’s independent obligations and legal responsibilities

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1953 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DIOVANNI CARTER, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Allison D. Burroughs, U.S. District Judge]

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, BAKER, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Daniel T. CARTER Aviation Boatswain’s Mate Aircraft Handler

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 4, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Vv. Criminal No. 21-0084 (PLF) CODY PAGE CARTER CONNELL and DANIEL PAGE ADAMS, ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendants Cody Page Carter Connell and Daniel Page Adams are charged in an eight-count indictment based on conduct related to the events at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. See Second Superseding Indictment (“Indictment”) [Dkt. No. 50]. Mr. Connell and Mr. Adams have waived th

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 4, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-0084 (PLF) ) CODY PAGE CARTER CONNELL and ) DANIEL PAGE ADAMS, ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Crim. Action No. 04-00122-1 (CKK) TYRONE V . CARTER, Defendant. ORDER (December 2, 2020) This case comes before the Court upon the receipt of a [39] Report and Recommendation from Mag

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crim. No. 20-05 (JDB) ALPHONSO CARTER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Alphonso Carter was indicted on one count of Unlawful Possession of a Firearm and Ammunition by a Person Convicted of a Crime Puni

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Gerald R. CARTER Jr., Private First Class United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0382 Crim. App. No. 20160770 Argued February 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No. 04-cr-0155 (ESH) ) DARRYL CARTER, )

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 28, 2019 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Criminal Action No. 18-180 (RMC) DAVID N. CARTER, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________

CCA 20150592 DAILY JOURNAL Interlocutory Orders Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to September 18, 2017.

CCA 20150692 DAILY JOURNAL Petitions for Grant of Review Filed

Judge RYAN delivered the opinion of the Court. Under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 ' U.S.C. § 867(a)(2) (2012), the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force (TJAG) certified the following issue: Whether the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCÁ) erred by finding that the convening authority

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. This appeal challenges us to figure out how best to put a ease back on track following a conviction, a vacation of that conviction on appeal, a dismissal of the indictment on remand, a government appeal of that dismissal, and the subsequent issuance of controlling authority making it clear that the original conviction was proper. For the following reasons,

CCA 38708. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues: I.THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS DISMISSED THE CHARGE AND SPECIFICATIONS IN THIS CASE IN 2013 AND AGAIN IN 2016. BUT IT EXCEEDED THE EIGHTEEN-MONTH PRESUMPTION OF UNREASONABLE DELAY BEFORE DOING SO EACH TIME.

CCA 38708. Appellant/Cross-Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review is denied.