Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 21-1705, 21-1707 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ÁNGEL MANUEL CARMONA-ALOMAR, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

PER CURIAM: A jury convicted Alejandro Carmona of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, heroin, and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(i), (b)(l)(A)(ii), and (b)(l)(A)(viii). He was subsequently sentenced to 240 months of incarceration, which was well below the applicable guidelines range. On appeal, Carmona raises three challenges to his conviction and sentence: (1) tha

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos Carmona-Cepeda raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance i

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos Carmona-Cepeda raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance i

PER CURIAM.* Esteban Carmona-Cepeda appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Carmona-Cepeda contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate off

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1947 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RONALD YOEL MARTE CARMONA, a/k/a Alberto Gonzalez Carmona, a/k/a Guy Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Wood

79 F.3d 1160 U.S.v.Carmona* NO. 95-4087 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Feb 28, 1996 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., No. 94-00363-CR-DLG 2

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION ASSERTING A CLAIM OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY GUIROLA, United States Magistrate Judge. BEFORE THIS COURT is the Motion of the Defendant, JIMMY CARMONA, assert*261ing a claim of double jeopardy.1 This matter was referred for hearing and submission of p

22 F.3d 303 U.S.v.Carmona (Jose) NO. 93-1591 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Mar 09, 1994 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. 2 AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1622 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JORGE L. MIRANDA-CARMONA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1241 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Veronica Gonzalez-Carmona, also known as Cinthia Selene Ramirez Barba, also

873 F.2d 569 27 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1172 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Fernando CARMONA, Jose Omar Sanchez, Carlos Escobar, FaoudHassan, Angelica Carvajal, Luz Marina Carvajal, Sophie MejiaCarvajal, Luis Garcia, Jesus Zambrano, Vicky Quinjano,Gonzalo Gaviria, Robert Pietri, Jose Santa Cruz-Londono, Defendants.Appeal of Gonzalo GAVIRIA, a/k/a "Palestino", Defendant-Appellant.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: Gonzalo Gaviria appeals from a May 22, 1988 judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (McLaughlin, J.), following a two-day jury trial in March 1988. In a one-count indictment appellant and 11 co-defendants were charged with conspiracy to import, possess and distribute large quantities of cocaine between 1980 and March 1984 in violation of

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Joseph M. McLaughlin, Judge, following a jury trial. Appellant Escobar was convicted of conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and of a substantive count of possession with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ruben Paredes-Carmona raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir.2015), petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015) (No. 14-10355). In Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. .§ 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) for a prior convicti

858 F.2d 66 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Fernando CARMONA, Jose Omar Sanchez, Carlos Escobar, FaoudHassan, Angelica Carvajal, Luz Marina Carvajal, Sophie MejaCarvajal, Luis Garcia, Jesus Zambrano, Vicky Quinjano,Gonzalo Gaviria, Robert Pietri, Jose Santa Cruz-Londono, Defendants,Carlos Escobar, a/k/a "Jairo Escobar", a/k/a "JavierTorres", a/k/a "Florecita", Defendant-Appellant. No. 1042,

820 F.2d 1229 *U.S.v.Carmona 86-5215 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 6/2/87 1 S.D.Fla. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

MOTION TO VACATE 28 U.S.C § 2255 ORDER HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE After pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit racketeering (see doc. 155),1 Eduardo Garibo moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction and sentence. Doe. 184. Review of the parties’ briefing shows that his motion must be denied. I. BAC