Cases

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, United States District Court Presently before the Court are Defendant’s motion to suppress and motion for return of property. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on these matters on October 25, 26 and 31, 2016. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motions are DENIED. I. FACTUA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Acti0n N0. 08-057-16 (BJR) AURELIO CANO FLORES, F I L E D D f ‘ d t. ° ‘“ ““ SEP 2 s 2012 ~ ‘ k t é;‘:t; t;?r..°:s:;:t;?,:“@;::::n;ii MEMORANDUM ORDER Defendant Jesus Enrique Rejon Aguilar and the United States jointly moved for joinder of Defendants Rejon Aguilar and Aurelio Cano Flores for trial and for a continuance of the trial currently scheduled for October 9, 2012 [Dkt. # 74]. The Government

519 F.3d 512 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin Lucero CANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-10940. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 10, 2008. *513 *514 Delonia Anita Watson, Fort Worth, TX, for U.S. Aaron Ray Clements, Hurley, Reyes & G

OPINION GARTH, Circuit Judge: Jaime Cano (“Cano”) appeals from the final judgment entered by the District Coiu’t on April 27, 2006. Counsel was appointed to represent Cano. Having filed a timely notice of appeal, Cano’s counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground there are no non-frivolous issues to appeal, and file

494 F.Supp.2d 243 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Nestor CANO, Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 3412(DC), No. 04 Cr. 236(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 12, 2007. *244 *245 Michael J. Garcia, Esq., United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York by Jessica A. Roth,

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Nestor Cano appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on August 17, 2005, which followed his guilty plea to participating in a conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. On this appeal, Cano argues that his 108-month sentence of incarceration must be vacated because the district court, in

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Cano-Matus appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence. He contends that the supervised release scheme set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583 is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it allows incarceration authorized by judicial fact finding, rather than

552 F.3d 637 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clemente CANO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3721. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Submitted December 22, 2008. Decided January 14, 2009. *638 Benjamin F. Langner, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for P

MEMORANDUM ** Eduardo Paño Cano appeals the 188-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v.

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gregorio Cano-Morales raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007),

MEMORANDUM * Francisco Cano-Matus (“Cano-Matus”) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *559§ 1291, and affirm. The parties are familiar with the facts and we do not recite them here. Cano-Matus argues that the district court erred in allowing the

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. Specialist Arturo Cano entered pleas of not guilty to one specification of sodomy with a child under twelve, three specifications of indecent acts with a child under sixteen, and one specification of indecent liberties with a child under sixteen in violation of Articles 125 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military

497 F.3d 1122 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio CANO-VARELA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-8020. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. August 10, 2007. *1123 David A. Kubichek, Assistant United States Attorney (Matthew H. Mead, United States Attorney, with him on the brief) for Plaintiff

PER CURIAM: * Counsel for Jose De Jesus Cano-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cano-Lopez has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t

MEMORANDUM ** We affirm the 60-month sentence the district court imposed on Roberto CanoRamirez after he pleaded guilty to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126,1130 (9th Cir.2006). We review Cano-Ramire

MEMORANDUM** Alejandro Pano Cano appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 168-month sentence for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine and for manufacturing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Cano has filed a

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-3721 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. C LEMENTE C ANO-R ODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No.

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. Defendant Hector Cano-Silva appeals the district court’s decision to dismiss the indictment against him without prejudice after finding a violation of the Speedy Trial Act. The government cross-appeals the district court’s determination that Mr. Cano-Silva’s activities warranted a minor-participant adjustment leading to a reduction in his sentence.

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: On August 27, 1997, a Southern District of Florida grand jury returned a seventy-six count indictment against appellants, Luis Cano and David Matos, and eight others. The indictment was the culmination of a lengthy investigation into the operation of a nationwide cocaine trafficking and money laundering network.

ORDER Remedios Cano appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on his plea of guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine after one prior felony drug conviction in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(B)(ii); possessing with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine after one prior drug felony conviction in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),