Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3093 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:06-cr-00234- RHW-GWF-1 v. DONNIE BRYANT, AKA Little Donnie, OPINION D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. No. 25-cr-0097-JDB NELSON DOMINIQUE BRYANT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Historically, when a magistrate judge has ordered a defendant’s release, that same magistrate judge has automatically stayed their decision. No longer. In

20-1078-cr United States v. Bryant In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-1078-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CHARLES BRYANT AKA C-ROCK,

18-3569 United States v. Bryant United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2019 (Submitted: April 13, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020) No. 18-3569 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2364 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRYANT D. ARON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2131 & 20-2297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. BRYANT LOVE, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1573 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Bryant Keethe Smith Ford llll

Hon. Vanessa L. Bryant, United States District Judge The Court sentenced Defendant James Bryant on December 19, 2018. In doing so, the Court considered Defendant's United States Sentencing Guidelines range, which is determined by his total offense level and his criminal history category ("CHC"). The parties disagree about Defendant's criminal history calculation. Defendant argues that his state court conviction and sentence for tamp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Criminal Action No. 15-152-05 (RMC) ) BRIAN BRYANT (5), ) )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10015 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:15-cr-00723-DKW-1 BRYANT KAZUYOSHI IWAI, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER Filed March 4, 2020 Before: Richard C. Tallman, Jay S. Bybee, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael F. Urbanski, United States District Judge Petitioner Randy Lee Bryant, Jr. brings this habeas corpus petition pursuant to-28 U.S.C. § 2255, asking the court to vacate -or -correct Ms sentence in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Johnson v. United States, - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). ECF N,o. 28. The government has moved to dismiss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-152 (RMC) ) TARKARA COOPER,

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sammy Lee Bryant, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bryant has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant port

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jessica Lynn Bryant has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bryant has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portion

ORDER In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion and judgment in United States v. Bryant, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 1954, 195 L.Ed.2d 317 (2016), the district court’s order denying Bryant’s motion to dismiss the indictment is AFFIRMED. Upon the filing of this order, the mandate shall issue forthwith.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10015 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:15-cr-00723-DKW BRYANT KAZUYOSHI IWAI, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawa

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.

*169Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John A. Bryant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 ÍJ.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated b

Summary 7/7/2016 4:12:59 PM Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: 15-420_new 15-420 23 pages (174 KB) 23 pages (177 KB) 7/7/2016 4:12:51 PM 7/7/2016 4:12:51 PM Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 8. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content.

*1967Justice THOMAS, concurring. The Court holds that neither the Sixth Amendment nor the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause prohibits the Government from using Michael Bryant’s uncoun-seled tribal-court convictions as predicates for the federal crime of committing a domestic assault within Indian country. Ante, at 1966; see 18 U.S.C. § 11