Cases

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jacob L. BRUBAKER-ESCOBAR, Sergeant United States Army, Appellant No. 20-0345 Crim. App. No. 20190618 Argued March 9, 2021—Decid

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jacob L. BRUBAKER-ESCOBAR, Sergeant United States Army, Appellant No. 20-0345 Crim. App. No. 20190618 Argued March 9, 2021—De

510 F.Supp.2d 506 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Bryan Joseph BRUBAKER, Defendants. No. CR 06-34-M-DWM. United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division. September 26, 2007. *507 Steven C. Haddon, Haddon Law Office, Helena, MT, for Defendants. Joseph Thaggard, U.S. Attorneys Office, Great Falls,

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Karl William Brubaker pled guilty to possession with the intent to distribute over 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A). At sentencing, he moved for a downward adjustment in his offense level due to his limited role in the offense. The district court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-2310 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. This is a consolidated appeal of three cases, A-1 Cigarette Vending Inc., v. United States, No. 01-5120, B&G Enterprises, Ltd., v. United States, No. 01-5080, and Brubaker Amusement Co. v. United States, Nos. 01-5070, -5083, and -5084. The appellants, owners and operators of tobacco vending machine businesses, appeal the dismissal of their complaints by the United Stat

304 F.3d 1349 BRUBAKER AMUSEMENT CO., INC., Pavlic Vending Service, Inc., Automated Services, Inc., B&G Enterprises, Ltd., A-1 Cigarette Vending, Inc.,A&B Cigarette Service, Inc., A&H Vending Co., Inc., A. Van Brackel & Sons, Inc., Ace Vending Company, Adams & Adams, Inc., Advanced Vending Co., Advanced Cigarette Service, Aero Merchandising Corporation, Al Faini Vending, Inc., All Star Amusements, Alliance Vending, Inc., And

Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-appellant Eleanor Daugerdas appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (William H. Pauley III, J. ), dismissing her petition asserting a third-party interest in certain accounts (the "Accounts") preliminarily forfeited in the underlying criminal proceedings against her hu

Filed 1/13/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN BETSEY BRUBAKER, B317694 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 17STFL05662) ANDY STRUM, Defendant and Respondent; MARK KARNEY, Object

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. In November 1992 the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) sent out a letter announcing a one-time supplemental payment of no less than $500 to MetLife “retirees” who “retired” prior to January 1, 1988. By mistake, it also sent the letter to

PELL, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Ralph E. Brubaker, pleaded guilty to two counts of embezzlement on a twenty-two count indictment, 18 U.S.C. § 656, and a one count information charging income tax evasion, 26 U.S.C. § 7201. The district court imposed the maximum sentence of five years of imprisonment on each of the two counts of the indictment, the

443 B.R. 176 (2011) In re Brian Richard BRUBAKER and Cynthia Ann Brubaker, Debtors. Brian Richard Brubaker and Cynthia Ann Brubaker, Appellants, v. Diane L. Jensen, Trustee, Appellee. No. 2:10-cv-358-FtM-29. Bankruptcy No. 9:09-bk-13722-ALP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. January 6, 2011. *177

2022 IL App (2d) 200160 No. 2-20-0160 Opinion filed January 14, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ In re MARRIAGE OF

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT BRUBAKER, Chief Judge: The United States petitions this court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. It seeks relief from a lower court ruling finding evidence of general military character admissible, directly at odds with the recently-amended Military Rule of Evidenoe 404, Manual

Chief Judge BRUBAKER and Senior Judge FISCHER concur. PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT MARKS, Judge: This case is before us as an interlocutory appeal by the Government, filed pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, and Rule FOR Courts-Martial 908, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2012 ed

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT MARKS, Judge: A panel of members with enlisted representation, sitting as a general court-martial, found the appellant guilty, contrary to his pleas, of four specifications of sexual abuse of a child and one specification of indecent exposure, in violation of Articles 120b and

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT KING, Senior Judge: The appellant pleaded not guilty at a general court-martial consisting of members with enlisted representation of committing a sexual assault and abusive sexual contact upon Sergeant (Sgt) F, and of committing a sexual assault upon and adultery with Lance C

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT HOLIFIELD, Judge: The appellee is currently facing trial by special court-martial on numerous charges regarding larceny from the Marine Corps *803 Exchange (MCX) on Camp Pendleton, California. He is charged with violations of Articles 81 and 12

Judge HOLIFIELD and Judge MARKS concur. PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT BRUBAKER, Senior Judge: A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of two specifications of attempted larceny and 12 specifications of larceny or wrongful

OPINION OF THE COURT BRUBAKER, Senior Judge: The petitioner asks that we direct his immediate release from confinement through a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Because we find his continued confinement to be lawful, we decline to do so. Background A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted the petitioner, contrary to his pleas, of rape and fo