Cases

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Brian S. Browder— having been convicted of possessing digital images and videos of child pornography, and having served the incarcerary portion of his sentence—appeals from an order finding him in violation of two conditions of his. supervised release. The District-Court (Lawrenc

79 F.3d 1144 U.S.v.Browder NO. 95-30356 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Feb 08, 1996 Appeal From: E.D.La., No. 94-CR-141-D 1 AFFIRMED.

DECISÍON HODGSON, Chief Judge: This appeal centers on the interpretation to be given Mil.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B) which states: * * * * * * (d) Statements which are not hearsay. A statement is not hearsay if: (1) Prior statement by witness. The declar

OPINION AND ORDER SMITH, Senior Judge: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs Complaint, Defendant’s Statement of Facts, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative, a Motion for Judgment upon the Administrative Record, Plaintiffs Motion For Leave to Amend Complaint, Defendant’s Opposition, and the Administrative Record. After careful consideration, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Opinion of the Court Kilday, Judge: Before a general court-martial convened in Okinawa, accused was arraigned on specifications charging two unauthorized absences, a larceny, a robbery, and two counts of housebreaking, in violation of Articles 86, 121, 122, and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 921, 922, and 930, respectively. He entered a plea of guilty, and was duly convicted. The cou

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 17-0552 JOE A. BROWDER, JR., PETITIONER, V. DAVID J. SHULKIN, M.D., SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, RESPONDENT. Before DAVIS, Chief Judge, and SCHOELEN and PIETSCH, Judges.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. *566Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 591.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREGORY E. BROWDER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2411 (TJK) CHRISTINE WORMUTH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER In this long-running dispute between Plaintiff Gregory E. Browder and Defendant Secre- tary of the Army, Browder file

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 20-OCT-2023 08:03 AM Dkt. 94 MO

873 P.2d 16 (1993) Perry BROWDER; Alice Browder; and The Water Wheel Partnership, a Colorado General Partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 92CA0995. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. October 21, 1993. Rehearing Denied December 2, 1993.

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RINAT AKHMETSHIN, Plaintiff, No. 18-cv-1638 (EGS) v. WILLIAM BROWDER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff Rinat Akhmetshin (“Mr. Akhmetshin”), a dual citizen of Russia and the United States, brings this defamation action against Defendant William

Justice ERICKSON specially concurring: The Fletcher Corporation (Fletcher) was the general construction contractor and own*137er of the Water Wheel Inn Motel. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (USF & G) issued a special multi-peril (SMP) casualty insurance contract to Fletcher in February 1975. The SMP policy provided in coverage C tha

PATTERSON, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises a point of law, whether the exhibition of a passport to a United States immigrant inspector as proof of the appellant’s citizenship on his entry into this country from a trip abroad is a “use” of such passport within the meaning of 22 U.S.Code, § 220, 22 U.S.C.A. § 220. Section 220, originally section 2 of title IX of the Act of June 15, 1917, reads: “Whoever shall willfully and k

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-SP-238 RINAT AKHMETSHIN, APPELLANT, V. WILLIAM BROWDER, APP