Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Brooks”
United States v. Brookspublic domain
Appellate Case: 24-6034 Document: 44 Date Filed: 02/25/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 25, 2025
United States v. Brookspublic domain
Case: 22-30369 Document: 00516855273 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________
United States v. Brookspublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Austin L. BROOKS Private (E-1), U.S. Mari
United States v. Brookspublic domain
Case: 21-60633 Document: 00516311614 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 9, 2022
United States v. Brookspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES v. Criminal No. 18-29 (JEB) ANTHONY BROOKS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Anthony Brooks is serving a ten-year mandatory-minimum sentence for transporting a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. He now moves for the fourth
United States v. Brookspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 18-29 (JEB) ANTHONY BROOKS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Less than three years into his ten-year prison sentence, Defendant Anthony Brooks moves for compassionate release, citing asthma and a heart condition as increasing th
United States v. Brookspublic domain
BRIAN C. WIMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen's Report and Recommendations (Doc. #74) concerning Defendant's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence and Statements. (Doc. #45). Defendant filed objections. (Doc. #77). After an independent review of the record and the applicable law, the Court adopts the Magistrate's Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby
United States v. Brookspublic domain
Joy Flowers Conti, Senior United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the court is a motion to suppress evidence and statements (ECF No. 38) filed by defendant Jamal Brooks ("Brooks"). Brooks is charged in a criminal indictment with possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon on August 22, 2017, in violation of
United States v. Brookspublic domain
Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge I. Introduction A federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment against defendant Jamal Brooks ("Brooks") for possessing a firearm and ammunition while being a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (ECF No.
United States v. Brookspublic domain
Per Curiam: *97In this case, defendant-appellant Jamaal Brooks pleaded guilty to distributing and possessing with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin. He was sentenced to 30 months' imprisonment and three years' supervised release. After he completed his prison sentence and began serving his term of supervised release, Brooks
United States v. Brookspublic domain
15-3737-cr United States v. Brooks 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2016 5 6 (Argued: May 10, 2017 Decided: June 1, 2018) 7 8 Docket No. 15‐3737‐cr 9 10 11 _____________________________________ 12 13 United States of America, 14
United States v. Brooks Chamberspublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7104 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BROOKS TYRONE CHAMBERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District
United States v. Brookspublic domain
16‐4063‐cr United States v. Brooks UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2017 (Submitted: December 13, 2017 Decided: May 2, 2018) Docket No. 16‐4063‐cr
United States v. Brookspublic domain
13‐3213‐cr (L) United States v. Brooks 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term, 2016 7 No. 13‐3213‐cr (L), 13‐4288‐cr(CON), 14‐2577‐cr(CON), 14‐2682‐cr(CON), 15‐ 8
United States v. Brookspublic domain
LEVAL, Circuit Judge: Daren Brooks appeals from an order entered on November 17, 2015, in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Charles J. Siragusa, J. ), denying Brooks's motion to reduce *434his sentence pursuant to
United States v. Brookspublic domain
DRONEY, Circuit Judge: On September 14, 2010, David H. Brooks was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Seybert, J.) after a jury trial on multiple counts of offenses relating to securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, and obstruction of justice. He was also convicted of related tax offenses based on his guilty pleas, which occurred after the jury’s verdict. Shortly before trial,
United States v. Brookspublic domain
CCA 20160666 DAILY JOURNAL Petitions for Grant of Review Denied
United States v. Brookspublic domain
DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge Defendant Howard E. Brooks ("Brooks") stands indicted in a multiple count Indictment charging receipt, possession and attempted distribution of child pornography. This Court referred all pretrial matters and motions to United States Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
United States v. Brookspublic domain
CCA 20160715, In the above reference cases, on consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
United States v. Brookspublic domain
CCA S32394. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 12, 2017.