Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Richard M. BROCKMAN Logistics Specialist First Cla

SMITH, Chief Judge. Chauncey Brockman pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Before sentencing, the United States Probation Office filed a presentence investigation report (PSR)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-4127 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Kenneth G. Brockman, *

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 332.

143 B.R. 703 (1992) In the Matter of Gerald Edward BROCKMAN and Carmen Deborah Brockman, Debtors. Gerald Edward BROCKMAN, Plaintiff, v. Linda Ruth BROCKMAN, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-922-W H, Adv. No. 91-91142. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa. July 1, 1992. C.R. Hannan, Council Bluffs, Iowa, for debtors. Jack E. Ruesch, Council Bluffs, Iowa,

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.

BYRNE, District Judge. Kenneth G. Brockman and Carolyn A. Kruger appeal their convictions for multiple counts of mail fraud and wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U .S.C. §§ 371, 1341, 1343. Kruger also appeals her sentence. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND Kruger was the President of Biologica

Filed 9/19/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (San Joaquin) ---- CHLOE E. BROCKMAN, C101451 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CV-

FARRIS, Circuit Judge: The Resolution Trust Corporation appeals the district court’s decision to sua sponte remand this case to state court after the removing party, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was dismissed from the action. We have jurisdiction, 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z )(3)(C), and we reverse. FACTS This action was originally commenced in Arizona Superior Court by

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

40 F.3d 1013 Shirley BROCKMAN, as natural mother and special conservatorof Michael D. Brockman, an incapacitated person,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MERABANK, a federal savings bank, Defendant,andResolution Trust Corporation, a corporation, instrumentalityan agency of the United States, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-15505. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

KURT'S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Appellant Freda Brockman (“Brock-man”) appeals from the. judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in *30favor of Respondent Jeanne Nangle (“Nangle”) in an action to quiet title in favor of Nangle with respect to five pieces of property formerly owned by Brockman. Because Nangle demonstrated the righ