Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Criminal Action No. 21-140 (JDB) LARRY RENDALL BROCK, Defendant. ORDER This is the unusual case in which defendant and prosecution agree on the necessary outcome: Larry Brock’s conviction for obstructing an official proceedi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-140 (JDB) LARRY BROCK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Larry Brock is charged via indictment with six offenses related to the breach of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. See generally Superseding Indictm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Crim. No. 21-140 (JDB) LARRY RENDALL BROCK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Larry Rendall Brock has been charged for his role in the events at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Pending before the

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lincoln Monroe Brock seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifica

PER CURIAM: Lincoln Monroe Brock appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 33 motion for a new trial predicated on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brock’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brock, No. 1:03-cr-00429-JAB (M.D.N.C., Aug. 10, 2007). We

501 F.3d 762 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Michael BROCK (05-6621); Jerry Giles Brock (05-6623); and Darrin T. Webb (05-6622/6645), Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 05-6621, 05-6622, 05-6623, 05-6645. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 31, 2007. Decided and Filed: September 6, 2007.

MEMORANDUM ** Rose Brock-Davis appeals from the district court’s restitution order following remand from this court’s decision in United States v. Brock-Davis, 504 F.3d 991 (9th Cir.2007). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. *538Brock-Davis contends that the district court erred by ordering r

504 F.3d 991 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rose BROCK-DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-30565. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 7, 2007. Filed October 2, 2007. *992 *993 John Rhodes, Assistant Federal Defende

*643 ORDER Rodney Brock appeals the ten-year sentence imposed after he was found guilty of bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Brock challenges the district court’s findings that he failed to accept responsibility and that he used a firearm during the commission of the bank robbery. We affirm. I. Background On May 15, 2001, Bro

MEMORANDUM2 Donald Charles Brock appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sen*709tence for mail fraud, and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1841 and 2. Brock’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-2279 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID C. BROCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-2279 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID C. BROCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Ind

Opinion of the Court CRAWFORD, Judge: Appellant was tried by a judge sitting alone at Royal Air Force Chicksands, United Kingdom. Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of wrongful use of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) “on divers occasions between on or about 20 February 1992 and on or about 7 December 1993,” wrongful use of marihuana “on divers occasions between on or about 20 February 1992

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4405 DONALD REECE BROCK, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-83) Argued: January 29, 1997 Decided: February 28, 1997 Before RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HERL

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 27, 2023 Decided March 1, 2024 No. 23-3045 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. LARRY RENDALL BROCK, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:21-cr-00140-1)

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-3045 September Term, 2022 1:21-cr-00140-JDB-1 Filed On: May 25, 2023 United States of America, Appellee v. Larry Rendall Brock,

41 F.3d 662 U.S.v.Brock* NO. 94-10357United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov 16, 1994 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 2:93-CR-26 1 AFFIRMED.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1148 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TONY BROCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

863 F.Supp. 851 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ronald Dean BROCK, James Daniel Soderna, Michael Charles Suhy, Dale Robin Pultz, Colin Lester Hudson, and Marilyn Ruth Hatch, Defendants. No. 94-CR-86 (JPS). United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. September 23, 1994. *852 *853