Cases

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, is vacated, and this case is withdrawn from submission to this panel. Counsel will be appointed in a separate order. Because we have vacated the memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, and withdrawn this case from submission to this panel, appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are denied as moot.<

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, is vacated, and these consolidated cases are withdrawn from submission to this panel. Counsel will be appointed in a separate order. Because we have vacated the memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, and withdrawn these cases from submission to this panel, appellants’ petitions for panel rehearing and petitions for rehearing en b

MEMORANDUM** Federal prisoner Ricardo Briones appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, challenging his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to participate in a racketeering enterprise, tampering with a witness, and two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see United States v. Rodr

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Riley Briones, Sr. (“Riley, Sr.”) and his son Riley Briones, Jr. (“Riley, Jr.”) appeal pro se from the district court’s judgments denying their 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions, challenging their convictions and sentences for various crimes related to their activities as gang members. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see United S

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cr-00464- DLR-4 RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown Spitz, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER On Remand from the United State

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cr-00464-DLR-4 RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown Spitz, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED OPINION On Remand from the United States Supr

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cr-00464- DLR-4 RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown Spitz, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150 Plaintiff-Appellee,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cr-00464- DLR-4 RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown Spitz, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10150 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:96-cr-00464- DLR-4 RILEY BRIONES, JR., AKA Unknown Spitz, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier Araguz-Briones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Araguz-Briones has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous is

PER CURIAM: * Francisco Javier Araguz-Briones appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 75-month sentence for illegal reentry after *333deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.1 Araguz’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235,

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: * Gabriel Perez-Briones has filed an unopposed motion to summarily affirm the conviction and summarily vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), and United States v. Estrada-Mendoza, 475 F.3d 258 (5th Cir.2007). The motion is GRANTED, the conviction is AFFIRMED, the sentence is VACA

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-1927 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District C

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 165 F. 3d 918.