Cases

123 B.R. 12 (1990) In the Matter of Paul A. BRENEGAN, Debtor. Alfred J. LINDH, Plaintiff, v. Paul A. BRENEGAN, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 89-228, Adv. No. 89-59. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 6, 1990. Alfred J. Lindh, Wilmington, Del., pro se. Thomas D. Runnels, Newark, Del., for debtor/defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

144 B.R. 932 (1992) In re Louis S. ST. LAURENT and Ellen St. Laurent, Debtors. John SHEARER and James Long, Plaintiffs, v. Louis S. ST. LAURENT, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 88-05188-BKC-AJC, Adv. No. 89-0133-BKC-AJC-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. July 2, 1992. A.P. Walter, Jr., P.A., Coral Gables, Fla., for plaintiffs. ORDER ON RE

185 B.R. 753 (1995) In re Jake Joseph MORELLO, Jr., Debtor. D. Vance MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. Jake Joseph MORELLO, Jr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 95-30180. Adv. No. 95-3038. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee. August 24, 1995. Finkelstein, Kern, Steinberg & Cunningham, Ronald E. Cunningham, D. Vance Martin, Knoxville, TN, for plaintiff. John

RYAN, Circuit Judge. Barry M. Perlin, the debtor in this bankruptcy case, appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that the debtor’s obligation under a divorce decree to pay his former spouse’s attorney fees and expert witness fees was part of a support obligation and thus was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5). Perlin argues on appeal that the plaintiffs— his former spous

138 B.R. 778 (1992) In re Stephen I. SILBERFEIN, Debtor. Philip L. FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. Stephen I. SILBERFEIN, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 91 B 10013(TLB), 91-5355 A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. April 7, 1992. *779 Weltman & Moskowitz by Michael Moskowitz, New York City, for plaintiff. Stephen

776 F.Supp. 431 (1991) V.T. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. TOMCO ACQUISITIONS, INC., a Wisconsin corporation, United Technologies Automotive, Inc., a Delaware corporation, B.R. Holdings, Ltd., a Wisconsin corporation, Defendants. No. 91-C-114. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. October 22, 1991. *432 Carlton Roffa, Brookfield,

256 N.J. Super. 404 (1992) 607 A.2d 186 MARY ROSE DIGIACOMO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD DIGIACOMO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted March 18, 1992. Decided May 19, 1992. *406 Before Judges KING, DREIER and GRUCCIO. Robert F. Binetti attorn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Stephen Gately, Plaintiff v. Case No. 17-cv-100-SM Opinion No. 2017 DNH 154 Mortara Instrument, Inc., Defendant O R D E R Plaintiff, Stephen Gately, filed this suit asserting claims arising out of his employment by the defendant, Mortara Instrument, Inc. (“Mortara” or th

30 F.3d 39 Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,976In re Barry M. PERLIN, Debtor.O'CONNOR, CAVANAGH, ANDERSON, WESTOVER, KILLINGSWORTH &BESHEARS; and Brown-Wright & Associates,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Barry M. PERLIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-3705. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued June 21, 1994.Decided July 12, 1994.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, who were the directors of the Powder River State Bank. Judgment was recovered against the defendants and from this judgment they appeal. The action is based upon an alleged violation of section 5150, W.C.S. 1920, and particularly for violating the law in making excessive loans. The parties will be referred to herein in the same manner as in the court below. A summary of the facts is as follows: Adams Webb, the plaintiff