Cases

Affirmed Opinion and Memorandum Opinion filed April 18, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00428-CR ANDRES ENRIQUE BONILLA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial C

648 F.2d 1373 UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Antulio PARRILLA BONILLA, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Judith BERKAN, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Salvador TIO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.William Andres TREVATHAN, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 79-1462, 79-1479, 79-1528 and 79-1533. United

626 F.2d 177 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Antulio PARRILLA BONILLA, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Judith BERKAN, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Salvador TIO, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.William Andres TREVATHAN, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 79-146

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On June 16, 2015, the United States filed a superseding indictment against the Defendant Andre Chandler, also known as “Mac Dre” (the “Defendant”), charging him with: (a) one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); (b) one count of discharge of a firearm during and in relation to a drug traffickin

ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant, Tiffany Foster’s (“Foster[’s]”) Motion for Judgment of Acquittal (“Motion”) [ECF No. 420], filed March 13, 2015.1 The United States of America (the “Government”) filed a Response ... (“Response”) [ECF No. 430] on March 27, 2015. Foster filed a Reply ... (“Reply”) [ECF No.

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Appellants Daniel Appolon (“Daniel”), Ernst Appolon (“Ernst”), Latoya Haltiwanger, J. Daniel Lindley, and Eric L. Levine were players in the Boston real estate market. Along with six coconspirators, appellants devised and executed a mortgage fraud scheme which netted them illegal profits of nearly $2 million between May 2005 and June 2006. The scheme itself w

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO SUPPRESS PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Suppress.1 (ECF No. 65.) The Government filed its response. (ECF No. .71.) An evidentiary hearing on the motion occurred on December 16, 2011. The parties have submitted

647 F.3d 450 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jerome H. FELDMAN, Defendant-Appellant. Docket Nos. 10-2275-cr (L), 10-2276-cr (con). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Submitted: May 25, 2011. Decided: August 1, 2011. *451 Vijay Shanker, Attorney (Lanny A. Breuer, Assistant Attorney Gener

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Andres Sanchez-Es-pinal appeals his sentence of twenty-four months imprisonment and two years of supervised release for being unlawfully present in the United States after deportation following a felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). Specifically, he challenges the district court’s imposition of an eight-level

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge: Ravis Neal Key, after ingesting a cornucopia of intoxicating drugs, crashed a car into a vehicle driven by Sergeant Andre M. Araujo, who died as a result. Key pled guilty to intoxication manslaughter and now challenges his 216-month sentence, contending that the sentencing court failed to adequately explain its reasons for imposing an above-guidelines sentence and that the sentence is, in itself,

COFFIN, Chief Judge. The sole issue presented by this motion is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to disqualify himself from ruling on appellants’ motion for a new trial.1 Finding that he did not, we affirm his ruling and remand for a decision on the motion for a new trial. After a non-jury trial, appellants were convicted of trespassing on military pro

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. Each of the appellants was convicted at a separate non-jury trial held in the District Court for the District of Puerto Rico of entering upon a United States naval reservation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382.1 Of their numerous challenges to the convictions and ensuing sentences, the most substantial is their contention that in each case the government failed

490 F.Supp.2d 21 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Sophoan OUNG, et al., Defendants. No. 05-10262-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 19, 2007. *22 *23 William F. Bloomer, Jennifer Hay Zacks, United States Attorney's Office, John Joseph Moakley, Boston, MA, for Plaintif

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Defendant Andrew Kornegay appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of distributing five or more grams of *92 cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 841(b)(1)(D). We affirm. I. We

MARTIN, Circuit Judge: This case consolidates criminal appeals by four co-defendants challenging the constitutionality of the Drug Trafficking Vessel Interdiction Act of 2008 (“DTVIA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2285. Jhon Jairo Valencia Saac, Victor Rodriguez Renegifo, Miguel Otero Estupinan, and Carlos Andres Mina Meneses (“defendants”) also appeal their 108 month sentences, imposed after

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 9, 2011 No. 09-14204 JOHN LEY ________

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 99-1790 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MARCOS MARTÍNEZ-MEDINA, Defendant, Appellant. ____________________ No. 99-1999 No. 01-1318 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee, v. M

OPINION BURY, District Judge. Appellant Eduardo Vargas-Castillo (“Vargas”) appeals his jury convictions for Importation of Cocaine and Marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960, and Possession of Cocaine and Marijuana with Intent to Distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Vargas argues that the indictment was multiplicitous, the search

279 F.3d 105 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Marcos MARTÍNEZ-MEDINA, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Manuel Pérez-Colón, Defendant, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Angela Ayala-Martínez, Defendant, Appellant. No. 99-1790. No. 99-1999. No. 99-2080. No

HILL, Senior Circuit Judge: Defendants/Appellants Rafael Sanchez and Luis Sanchez, father and son, were arrested in October, 1988, in South Carolina for alleged local narcotics offenses. The South Carolina charges were dropped and the San-chezes were extradited to Puerto Rico to face charges for the events which underlie the case now on appeal. In Pue