⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Boakye”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 277 F. App'x 89
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Akosua Animpong appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a guilty plea, entered on January 8, 2007, and defendant-appellant Caroline Quarshie appeals from a judgment of con*91viction, following a jury trial, entered on January 17, 2007. Both judgments were entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 59 F. App'x 370
SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER *371COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated Term o
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019-04-08 · Published · cited 7× · 376 F. Supp. 3d 663
T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge This matter arises from the final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the United States Citizenship & Immigration Services' ("USCIS") decision to deny plaintiff's 1-130 alien relative petition to grant a visa to plaintiff's spouse. In short, BIA and USCIS justified the denial of plaintiff's petition on the ground that there was substantial and probative evi
Boakye v. Hansenpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008-03-17 · Published · cited 1× · 554 F. Supp. 2d 784; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24462; 2008 WL 731436
(2008) Emmanuel E. BOAKYE, Plaintiff, v. Mark B. HANSEN, District Director Citizenship an Immigration Services, Defendant. No. 3:06cv373. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 17, 2008. DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING, AS MOOT, IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OR TO
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018-03-06 · Published · cited 1× · 295 F. Supp. 3d 1342
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., United States District Judge This is a Jones Act case. It is before the Court on the Plaintiff Kwabena Boakye's Motion to Remand [Doc. 7] and the Defendants NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., NCL America Holdings, LLC, NCL America, LLC, and *1344Pride of America Ship Holdings, LLC's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 3]. For the following reaso
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003-04-23 · Published · cited 0× · 63 F. App'x 544
*546 SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal be DISMISSED IN PART and, insofar as the appeal not be dismissed, the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant George Agyeman appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Chin, J.) </
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-06-25 · Published · cited 1× · 952 F. Supp. 2d 537; 2013 WL 3270335
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. By indictment filed on October 30, 2003, the Government charged Andres Marte (“Marte”) with one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (“Count One”) among other charges. On August 24, 2005, Marte pled guilty to Count One pursuant to a written plea agreement
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997-07-31 · Published · cited 20× · 698 A.2d 459; 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 167; 1997 WL 426938
698 A.2d 459 (1997) Frank DURPHY, Elizabeth Durphy, Appellants, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF MID-ATLANTIC STATES, INC., Appellee. Nos. 94-CV-851, 94-CV-1136. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 22, 1996. Decided July 31, 1997. *461 Lawrence S. Lapidus, Washington, DC, with whom Anthony G. N
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 NY Slip Op 04195
Gottlieb v City of New York (2023 NY Slip Op 04195) Gottlieb v City of New York 2023 NY Slip Op 04195 Decided on August 9, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 02300
Dray v Staten Is. Univ. Hosp. (2024 NY Slip Op 02300) Dray v Staten Is. Univ. Hosp. 2024 NY Slip Op 02300 Decided on May 1, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
Bhatara v. Kolajpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-12-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 NY Slip Op 06721
Bhatara v Kolaj (2023 NY Slip Op 06721) Bhatara v Kolaj 2023 NY Slip Op 06721 Decided on December 27, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Dunlap v. Cockrellpublic domain
United States Circuit Court · 2018-09-18 · Published · cited 9× · 336 F. Supp. 3d 1364
WILLIAM H. STEELE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This recently removed matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Response to Show Cause Order (doc. 4). On August 21, 2018, defendant, Michael E. Cockrell, filed a Notice of Removal (doc. 1) removing this action from the Circuit Court of Perry County, Alabama to this District Court. Cockrell posited that federal subject matter jurisdiction was conferred by
Ganesan v. Dretkepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1082; 125 S. Ct. 948
*1082ante, p. 816; ante, p. 819; ante, p. 822; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 824; ante, p. 830; ante, p. 832; ante, p. 832; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 836;
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AKWASI BOAKYE OSEI, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-1644-RC : v. : Re Document Nos.: 23, 27, 29
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AKWASI BOAKYE OSEI, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-1644-RC : v. : Re Document No.: 9
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009-05-26 · Published · cited 3× · 62 A.D.3d 925; 881 N.Y.S.2d 106
*926In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants Lorraine Broxmeyer and Terence Eckstein are required to provide the plaintiff with access to their condominium unit to allow the plaintiff to install windows on the wall located in the terrace appurtenant to that unit, and to compel those defendants to provide such access, the defendants Lorraine Broxmeyer and Terence Eckste
Klayman v. Raopublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY E. KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-02473 (CRC) THE HONORABLE NEOMI RAO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Larry E. Klayman, proceeding pro se, filed this action against the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for D
Brea v. Statepublic domain
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2010-12-03 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION The case is before the Court on Petitioner Fernelys Brea's application for post conviction relief. On May 20, 2008, Fernelys Brea was charged with a single count of receiving stolen goods, valued at over $500.00, in violation of R.I.G.L. 1956 §§ 11-41-2 and 11-41-5. At that time, the United States Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) classifi
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AKWASI BOAKYE OSEI, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-1530 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 2, 15, 18, 21, 27 :
Hernandez v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-04-06 · Published · cited 14× · 61 So. 3d 1144; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4787; 2011 WL 1262148
SALTER, J. Gabriel A. Hernandez appeals a circuit court order denying his motion to vacate his plea, judgment and sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion was filed approximately three months after the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010). The issues on appeal are (1) whether the fact that the trial