Cases

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700155 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. TERRANCE A. BLOCK Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine

635 F.3d 721 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean Michael BLOCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50668. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 11, 2011. *722 Joseph H. Gay, Jr. and Margaret Mary Embry, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Antonio, TX, for U.S. Nancy Blair Barohn, San Antonio, TX, for Bl

59 F.3d 1245 U.S.v.Block* NO. 93-4497 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. June 16, 1995 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., No. 92-00115-CR-JWK 2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Manion, Circuit Judge. In April 2014, William Block completed a 75-month prison term and began a three-year term of supervised release. With a little more than two months left in that term, the Probation Office reported to the district court Block had violated release conditions. Over a year later, the district court conducted a hearing and revoked Block's supervised release, sentencing

PER CURIAM. *656 When Keith Block pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), he became eligible for a fifteen-year mandatory-mini

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2128 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM BLOCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2128 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM BLOCK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRANCIS DAMIEN BLOCK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-03073 (CJN) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23, and Plaintiff’s Motion

ORDER ON DEFENDANT WINDSOR CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY CORRIGAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This case came before the Court on defendant Windsor Corporation’s Motion for Order Compelling Discovery (Doc. #40), filed February 13, 1997, to which plaintiff filed a response in opposition (Doc. # 51), filed March 3, 1997. The Court held a lengthy hearing on the motion on Marc

ORDER CORRIGAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This condemnation case is before the Court on the Motion to Allow Defendant to Amend its Response to Plaintiffs First Request for Admissions and Deny Request For Admission Number 7 (Doc. #29) (the “Motion”), filed by defendant the Windsor Corporation (“defendant”) on November 14, 1996. Plaintiffs Response to the Motion (Doc. # 31) was filed on November 26, 1

ORDER NIMMONS, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Order, etc. (Dkt. 59) and Defendant Windsor Corporation’s Response (Dkt. 64) in Opposition thereto. Also filed herein is Plaintiff’s First Motion for Continuance (Dkt. 58) to which no response has been filed. This is an eminent domain action initiated by the United

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-­tiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 635 F.3d 721.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. This consolidated criminal appeal involves eight defendants who participated in a large heroin distribution conspiracy that operated out of Rockford, Illinois. Each pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than one kilogram of heroin and more than fifty grams of cocaine base. The principal argument on appeal is tha

07/26/79 INDICTMENT RETURNED. CASE REFERRED TO JUDGE CAFFREYFOR ARRAIGNMENT AND ASSIGNMENT OF TRIAL DATE. 8/3/79 COHEN, M. Deft Block appears, bail set at $25,000 w/s, travel restricted, and sign in with Marshal every Friday. Atty. Richard Barry appears. As to Travton, Atty. Richard Garguilo enters appearance, Atty. Fishman appearing on behalf of Atty. Merberg is advised. Merberg withdraws. All defts are arraigned, plead not guilty, auto

FI[.ED uNITED sTArEs DlsTRlcT coURT NOV 1 7 2017 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C\,rk' U_s_ munoz a humptcy Courts tor the Dlstrlct of Co|umbla Francis Damien Block_ ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2066 (UNA) ) Treasurer of the United States, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se Complaint and application for leave to proceed inforch pauperis The application will be granted, and the complaint will be

497 F.Supp. 629 (1980) UNITED STATES of America v. Lawrence J. BLOCK. Crim. A. No. 80-39A. United States District Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. October 7, 1980. James E. Fagan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff. Edgar A. Neely, III, Robert G. Fierer, Fierer & Devine, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant. ORDER OR

624 F.2d 1091 U. S.v.Block 80-1093 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 7/17/80 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED