Cases

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge. Under the federal environmental laws, the owner of property contaminated with hazardous substances or a person who arranges for the disposal of hazardous substances may be strictly liable for subsequent clean-up costs. In this case, the United States owned national forest lands in New Mexico that were mined over several generations by Chevron Mining Inc

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This lawsuit involves a dispute over who must pay for environmental cleanup and remediation at the Jackpile Paguate uranium mine, located in Cibola County, New Mexico within the boundaries of the Pueblo of Laguna. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently listed the mine on the National Priorities List (NPL), 40 C.F.

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small wonder it had to go to trial! *164On November 20, 2017, t

571 S.E.2d 565 (2002) 257 Ga. App. 580 WADDELL v. BHAT. No. A02A1319. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 24, 2002. Milton D. Rowan, for appellant. Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney, Rolfe M. Martin, Atlanta, for appellee. BLACKBURN, Chief Judge. In this case involving an action for wrongful disclosure of confid

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Chevron Mining, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the United States’ Ownership Liability [Doc. 28]; Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the United States’ Arranger Liability [Doc. 29]; and The United States’ Cross Motion for ■

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, a part of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., is a “federal permit program designed to regulate the discharge of polluting effluents” into the Nation’s waters. Int’l Paper Co. v. Ouellette, 479 U.S. 481, 489, 107 S.Ct. 805, 93 L.Ed.2d 883 (1987). Upon request, the Environmental Protection Agency may transfer NPDES permitting aut

816 F.Supp.2d 693 (2011) PRITIRED 1, LLC, Principal Life Insurance Company, Tax Matters Partner, and Principal Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 4:08-cv-00082-JAJ-TJS. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. September 30, 2011. *695 Harold N. Schneebeck, Jr., Varun

OPINION PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant Dr. Geetha Bhat appeals judgment for defendants following a jury trial in this action for gender and national origin discrimination in employment. Dr. Bhat’s claims on appeal arise from the district court’s handling of a juror following a poll of the jury, during which the juror dissented from the verdict. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM. I.

MEMLORANDUM AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. This case arises from a controversy regarding a permit issued by the United States Army Corps (“Corps”) to Energy Answers Arecibo, LLC (“Energy Answers”) for the construction of a waste to energy resource facility in Arecibo, Puerto Rico. Before the Court is Citizens of Karst, Inc., Femando Marquez-Loyola, and Javier B

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Citizens of the Karst, Inc., Fernando Marquez-Loyola, and Javier Biaggi-Ca-ballero (collectively, “plaintiffs”) brought this action against the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), Thomas P. Bostick, in his official capacity as United States Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the Corps, and Alan M. Dodd, in his official capacity as District

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s Motion To Dismiss, or in the Aternative, for Summary Judgment, pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) and 56. Plaintiff claims that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) took his riparian property by denying a fill permit application under section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344 (200

OPINION AND ORDER STANCEU, Chief Judge: In this consolidated action, plaintiffs El-kay Manufacturing Company (“Elkay”) and Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Company, Ltd. (“Dongyuan”) contest a determination (“Final Determination”) that the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Departm

Senior Judge MCFARLANE and Judge HOLIFIELD concur. BRUBAKER, Judge: This ease is before us on an interlocutory appeal by the United States under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862, and Rule FOR CoüRts-Martial 908, Manual FoR Courts-Martial, United States (2012 ed.). The appellee is currently charged with sodomy with a child under the age of 12 and two specifications of indecent act

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0315p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X

715 F.Supp.2d 587 (2010) KD, a minor, by his parent and natural guardian, Kenneth DIEFFENBACH, and Kenneth DIEFFENBACH, in his own right, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 07-515-GMS-MPT. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 25, 2010. *588 Charles Snyderman, Charles Snyderman, P.A., Wilmington,

HUCK, District Judge: The Americans with Disabilities Act’s provision for reasonable accommodation of disabled workers is at the heart of- this case. Leokadia Bryk, a disabled nurse, sought a reasonable accommodation in the form of a job reassignment to another unit at St. Joseph’s Hospital because she required the use of a cane, which posed a safety hazard in the psychiatric wa

OPINION BOGGS, Chief Judge. DefendanU-Appellant Ahmed Brika was tried for conspiracy to commit a kidnapping offense and for using a telephone to extort money in exchange for the release of a kidnapped person. The jury found him guilty of the second offense, but was unable to reach a verdict on the first, as to which the judge declared a mistrial. He was t

Mr. Justice Harlan, whom Mr. Justice Frankfurter joins, dissenting. Since The Hamilton, 207 U. S. 398, it has been settled law that an action in personam for wrongful death occurring on navigable waters, not available under maritime law, The Harrisburg, 119 U. S. 199, may be brought under a state- wrongful death statute. In The Tungus v. Skovgaard, 358 U. S. 588, deci

Mollison, Judge: On March 21, 1947, the plaintiff in this case imported 1,620 bags, containing 216,579 pounds of naphthalene, on *145which duty was paid at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem plus-3% cents per pound under the provisions of paragraph 27 (a) (1) of the-Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Belgian Trade Agreement, T. D. 47600. Subsequently, at some time i