Cases

611 F.3d 168 (2010) Kumar BHARGAVA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent. No. 08-3348. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 14, 2010. Opinion Filed July 1, 2010. *169 Michael S. Henry, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.

Brij Bhargava v. Prince George’s County Planning Board, No. 0659, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Kehoe, S., J. Background: The Prince George’s County Planning Department of the Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission approved of an application for a variance from the County’s tree conservation ordinance to permit the Prince George’s County Public Schools to remove eleven specimen trees to allow for the construction of new school. Citizen Appellants filed an appeal to the Prince

143 F.Supp.2d 16 (2001) Brij N. BHARGAVA, Plaintiff, v. Amy VENEMAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Defendant. No. CIV A 98-2182 (ESH/JM). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 7, 2001. *17 Gary Thomas Brown, Janice Anne Simons, Brown & Simons, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Brij N. Bhargava.

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The United States of America, on behalf of the Office of Inspector General for the General Services Administration (“OIG”), filed the Petition for Summary Enforcement of two Inspector General (“IG”) Subpoenas Duces Tecum (“Petition”), which is pending before th

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 22-2683 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATALYA SHVETS, Appellant _____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (District Court No. 2:12-cr

Slip Op. 25- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KUMAR INDUSTRIES, Plaintiff, Before: Judge Gary S. Katzmann v. Court No. 23-00263 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [ Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record is denied. ]

Slip Op. No. 24-105 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CHANDAN STEEL LIMITED, Plaintiff, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge v. Court No. 21-00540 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Denying relief on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-1870 (Filed: July 18, 2025) (Re-issued: July 25, 2025) * ******************** SIEMENS GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ********************* Robert Nichols, Washington, D.C., with whom were Michael Bhargava and Logan Kemp, for plaintiff, Siemens Government Technolog

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-698 (Issued Under Seal: March 28, 2025) 1 Reissued: April 15, 2025 ) SIEMENS GOVERNMENT ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) )

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1817C Filed: April 8, 2022* FOR PUBLICATION G4S SECURE INTEGRATION LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and CGS-ORSA SECURITY LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Richard P. Rector, DLA Piper LLP, Washington, D.C., for the plaint

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-237 (Filed: 14 December 2022) * *************************************** CGS-ASP SECURITY, JV, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * Pre-Award Bid Protest; Motion for v. *

Universal Turbine v. Brij Bhargava CV-98-553-JD 01/21/99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Universal Turbine Energy Systems, Inc. v. Civil Nos. 98-553-JD, 98-555-JD Brii Bhargava O R D E R Following the demise of a business relationship between plaintiff. Universal Turbine Energy Systems, Inc. ("UTES"), and defendant, Brij Bhargava, UTES brought two compa

OPINION FIRESTONE, Judge. This case arises over a contract entered into in 1997 between the United States General Services Administration (“GSA”), La-Salle Partners (“LaSalle”), and, subject to dispute, Moore & Associates, Inc. (“Moore”). The contract was for the purpose of providing asset management and development services to the government in connection with a plan to convert the former Naval Surfa

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-1313C July 30, 2026 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * SIEMENS GOVERNMENT * TECHNOLOGIES, INC., * Plaintiff, * * v. *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 26-282C Filed: June 2, 2026 FOR PUBLICATION SIEMENS GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Michael Bhargava and Logan Kemp, Nichols Law LLP, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff. Matthew Roche, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice,

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST. CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Marathon Oil Company and Mobil Oil Exploration and Producing Southeast, Inc. (collectively “the Oil Companies”) brought a breach of contract claim against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims. After appeal to the Federal Circuit and to the Supreme Court, they pr

MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs—Palestinians and Palestinian-Americans from East Jerusalem, the West *75 Bank, the Gaza Strip, and five Palestinian village councils—bring this lawsuit against forty-nine Defendants, including indivi

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************** CHRISTINA ANDERSON, * * No. 20-830V * Special Master Christian J. Moran Petitioner, * v. * * Filed: May 14, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************** SUSAN NILES, * * No. 22-1316V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: January 22, 2025 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ************************* TONY CAMPBELL, * No. 22-1130V * Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * * Filed: November 26, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *