Cases

ORDER FORRESTER, District Judge. This action is before the court on defendant’s 1 motion to set aside judgment, plaintiff’s motion to compel, and defendant’s motion for a protective order. Because the court concludes that defendants’ motion to set aside judgment should be granted and that this action should, therefore, be dismissed, the latter two motions are moot.

Plaintiff brought an action in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis for personal injuries, and went to trial on a second amended petition alleging, in substance, that defendant owned and had the maintenance and control of a building on the northeast corner of Whittier Street and Enright Avenue in the city of St. Louis; that the sidewalks adjacent thereto were open and public, for the use of pedestrians; that on September 24, 1922, a piece of ridge roll fell from the roof of said buildin

601 F.2d 578 Young & Bertke Co.v.Dumbauld No. 79-1343 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 6/5/79 MANDAMUS DENIED

601 F.2d 575 Season-All Industries, Inc.v.Young & Bertke Co. No. 79-1343 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 6/5/79 MANDAMUS DENIED

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CAMPBELL, Chief Judge. The government brings this action for the collection of federal estate taxes previously assessed and allegedly due from the estate of Gertrude Witbeck Hanlin (hereinafter referred to as “decedent”). Defendant, Harris Trust and Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as “Harris”), is the executor of the estate and trustee of five trusts created by the will of the d

[Cite as Kunz v. Reisenfeld, 2012-Ohio-5460.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO LINDEN L. KUNZ, : APPEAL NO. C-120179 TRIAL NO. A-1010655 and : O P I N I O N. MT. CARMEL COMMUNICA

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Apr 14 2016, 9:19 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK Indiana Supreme Court regarded as precedent or cited before any Co

[Cite as Gibson Bros., Inc. v. Oberlin College, 2022-Ohio-1079.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) GIBSON BROS., INC., et al. C.A. Nos. 19CA011563 20CA011632 Appellees/Cross-Appellants v.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 490 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 491 {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Jane Doe, has appealed from the trial court's entry granting the motion to di

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Cable News Network, Inc. v. Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local Schools, Slip Opinion No. 2020- Ohio-5149.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 So

* Reporter's Note: A motion for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio was overruled in 43 Ohio St.3d 707, 540 N.E.2d 724. This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal from the Hamilton County Municipal Court. Defendant-appellant Gregory J. Long has taken the instant appeal from his conviction of criminal child enticement in contraventi

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 234 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 235 This appeal follows appellant's conviction for menacing by stalking, in violation of R.C. 2903.211

Defendant-appellant, James E. Kroner, was convicted of criminal child enticement, R.C. 2905.05, and public indecency, R.C.2907.09. After a bench trial, the judge sentenced Kroner to one hundred eighty days' imprisonment and fined him $1,000 on the child enticement charge, and to thirty days' imprisonment and a $250 fine on the public indecency charge. The court ordered the sentences to run consecutively. The evidence

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS OF PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM A. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge. Dated at Dayton, Ohio this 29th day of November, 1988. This matter is before the court upon cross-motions of plaintiff and defendant for summary judgment. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and the standing order of reference entered in this distri

927 F.2d 895 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2463, 118 Lab.Cas. P 10,629 The BECKER ELECTRIC COMPANY; Plaintiff,Bertke Electric Company, Inc.; and Stapleton ElectricCompany, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION# 212 AFL-CIO; and International Brotherhood ofElectrical Workers, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-3348.

In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, the respondent recovered a judgment against the appellant in the sum of $15,000 for injury to his left eye. The respondent's action is founded upon an alleged violation of the Federal Boiler Inspection Act, as amended, 45 U.S.C.A., Sections 22-24. From this judgment the appellant has duly appealed. Respondent was a fireman on one of appellant's local freight trains running west out of Slater, Missouri. On February 28, 1934, he was injur

Plaintiff, Thomas Foster, sued defendants, James M. Kurn and John G. Lonsdale, Trustees of the "Frisco" Railway Company, for damages suffered in a crossing accident. Trial to a jury resulted in verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $7042 but the trial court ordered remittitur in the amount of $2042, which order plaintiff complied with. Defendants' motion for new trial was overruled and they have appealed. We shall refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendants.

HYDE, Judge. Action for $150,000.00 damages for personal injuries. Verdict for defendants and plaintiff has appealed. Both defendants had counterclaims, the corporate defendant for damages to its automobile involved and the individual defendant for personal injuries, on which the jury found for plaintiff and they have not appealed. We will refer to the individual defendant as the defendant. Plaintiff was

This is an appeal by appellants, defendants below, from a judgment against them in plaintiff's favor in the sum of $10,000 for the death of plaintiff's husband. The case comes to the writer on reassignment. Respondent is the widow of Sidney Stark, who lost his life at a grade crossing in the village of Shrewsbury, St. Louis County, Missouri, in a collision between a Frisco passenger train and a truck driven by Stark. Appellants are: G.R. Berger, the engineer of the train; J.M. Kurn and

* NOTE: Opinion filed at September Term, 1939, March 6, 1940; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled at May Term, 1940, May 7, 1940. This is an action for $50,000.00 damages, for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff's automobile was struck by defendants' train. The jury found the issues for defendants. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment for defendants. [1] Defendants have filed a motion to dismi