Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2688 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Bernard Manuel lllllllll

Case: 17-14370 Date Filed: 03/31/2020 Page: 1 of 32 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-14370 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-20836-PCH-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Pl

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT April 24, 2019 No. 17-2548 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BERNARD GREENSPAN, Appellant (D.N.J. No. 2-16-cr-00114-001) Present: HARDIMAN, KRAUSE, and BIBAS, Circuit Judges 1.

Barrett, Circuit Judge. *691 Bernard Cherry appeals his conviction as a felon in possession of a firearm on the ground that the district court erred by not giving the jury his proposed "innocent possession" instruction. He also claims that the district court erred by not asking whether he wa

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ro-mar Bernard has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bernard has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portion

BIBAS, Circuit Judge. Sometimes, the only plausible explanation for a lab's stream of payments to a doctor is cash for blood. Over seven years, Dr. Bernard Greenspan referred more than 100,000 blood tests to Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services. The Lab made more than $3 million off these tests. In exchange, the Lab gave Greenspan and his associates more than $200,000 in cash, gifts, and

BIBAS , Circuit Judge . Sometimes, the only plausible explanation for a lab's stream of payments to a doctor is cash for blood. Over seven years, Dr. Bernard Greenspan referred more than 100,000 blood tests to Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services. The Lab made more than $3 million off these tests. In exchange, the Lab gave Greenspan and his assoc

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0189p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaint

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Kenya BERNARD Yeoman Second Class (E-5), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMG 0262 Docket No. 1328 2 November 2012 General Court-Martial convened by Co

McClelland, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of wrongful sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); one specification of assault, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ; and one specification each of indecent assault and indecent language, in violation o

CCA 0262. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES. No briefs will be filed

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 16, 2013 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, District Judge No. 13-1854 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant, Bernard C. Sei-dling (“Seidling”), was charged with creating and executing a scheme to defraud by knowingly mailing documents containing false information to small claims courts in Wisconsin and hiding the filings of the actions from the named defendants. Sei-dling stipulated to the facts of the charge and waived his right to a jury tri

McClelland, Chief Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted mem*695bers. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of wrongful sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 920; one specification of assault, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Washington, D.C. UNITED STATES v. Kenya BERNARD Yeoman Second Class (E-5), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMG 0262 Docket No. 1328 21 December 2010 G

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Bernard Foster sold crack cocaine to a paid confidential informant (“Cl”) through a series of controlled buys facilitated by federal agents. Foster was charged with several counts of knowingly and intentionally distributing cocaine base, and a jury ultimately convicted him on four separate counts. The district court sentenced him to serve 240 months’ impris

COOK, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COX, D.J., joined and MERRITT, J., joined in part. MERRITT, J. (pp. 854-56), delivered a separate opinion dissenting in part. OPINION COOK, Circuit Judge. Defendant Bernard K. Watkins, an African-American supervisor of security-systems contracts for a school district in Cleveland, Ohio, corruptly solicited and obtained money from a con

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 September 27, 2010 Before DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge Nos. 08‐2512 & 08‐2443 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the Plaintiff‐Appellant/

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 08-2655 & 08-2661 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. B ERNARD D OUGLAS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Nos. 04 CR 10074 & 07 CR 10080—Micha

PER CURIAM. Having reviewed the evidence and considered argument of counsel, we find no reversible error as to the conviction in this case. Accordingly, Jacky Bernard’s conviction is affirmed. However, the government concedes there was error in sentencing and accordingly we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of *856United States v. Booker, </