Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Eberth Castaneda-Benitez has moved for *203leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011), Castaneda-Beni-tez has not filed a res

Case: 22-11084 Document: 163-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-11084 FILED

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 18-1541 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARCOS CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 3:17-cr-00038-jdp-1 — James

Bauer, Circuit Judge. Marcos Castaneda pleaded guilty to transporting methamphetamine as part of a 20-person conspiracy. Though the district court sentenced his coconspirators based on findings that they distributed mixtures containing methamphetamine, it sentenced Castaneda based on his handling of a smaller quantity of "Ice," or especially pure (at least 80%) methamphetamine. Pound fo

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 18-1541 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARCOS CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 3:17-cr-00038-jdp-1 — James

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 18-1541 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARCOS CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 3:17-cr-00038-jdp-1 — James

*1361ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 40] recommending the denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Statements [Docs. 11, 30].1 The Defendant has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R that chal

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Paul Suarez for his involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy and for firearms offenses. Suarez appeals contending that the convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence. He also asserts that the district court erred in imposing a 120-month (ten year) mandatory minimum prison sentence for possession of a sawed-off shotgun in furtherance of

Case: 14-40046 Document: 00513311818 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2015 REVISED DECEMBER 16, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-40046 FILED

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Three defendants appeal their convictions for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute controlled substances and related charges. These defendants were part of a group of thirty-seven people who were indicted for a drug conspiracy after a mul-ti-year FBI investigation that recorded over 77,000 telephone calls. Other than the three defendants here (

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHULA VISTA CITIZENS FOR JOBS No. 12-55726 AND FAIR COMPETITION; LORI KNEEBONE; LARRY BREITFELDER; D.C. No. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND 3:09-cv-00897- CONTRACTORS OF SAN DIEGO, INC., BEN-JMA Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION DONNA NORRIS; MAYOR CHERYL COX; PAMELA BENSOUSSAN; STEVE CASTANEDA; JOHN MC

653 F.3d 983 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. T.D. BINGHAM, aka Seal B; Bull; Tyler Davis Bingham; The Hulk, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar Wesley Hevle, aka Seal R; Snail, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 06-50668, 06-50669. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 2011

REVISED AUGUST 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40632 July

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, and EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, and joined as to parts LA, I.B, and I.D by EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. For the first time ever, this court reverses a below-guideline sentence for alleged unfairness. And for at least the 181st time, it reverses a case on plain error, despite the Supreme C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-10113 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-05101-1- LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-LARA, OWW Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Luis Manuel Rodriguez-Lara (“Rodriguez”), an alien convicted of reentry after deportation, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to appoint an expert to assist him in pursuing his equal protection and fair cross-section challenges to the composition of the jury pool in the Fresno Division of the Eastern District o

47 F.3d 356 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Santiago PENA-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30405. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1993.Decided Feb. 3, 1995. Mark Bennett Weintraub, Weintraub & Halley, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellant.<

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: The appellant, Eduardo Jaime Rouco, was convicted of murdering Eddie Benitez, a special agent of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Department of the Treasury (ATF), while Agent Benitez was operating in an undercover capacity investigating firearms and narcotics trafficking in South Fl

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge MIKVA. MIKVA, Chief Judge: Appellant Fawaz Yunis challenges his convictions on conspiracy, aircraft piracy, and hostage-taking charges stemming from the hijacking of a Jordanian passenger air *1089 craft in Beirut, Lebanon. He a

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”), Appeal of Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., ASBCA No. 36751, 1990 WL 57424 (Apr. 26, 1990), granting summary judgment to appellee, Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company (“Newport News”), and holding that it had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain Newport News’ contract cl