Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. Action No. 89-273 (ABJ) CORZETTE BELL, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ORLANDO BELL, Case No. 17-cr-234-7 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER In 2018, a jury convicted Orlando Bell of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute and possessing a firearm “in furtherance” of the “[d]rug

Case: 23-50755 Document: 91-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50755 ____________ F

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, v. Case No. 1:17-cr-00234-7 (TNM) ORLANDO BELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER An investigation of drug dealers in southeast Washington, D.C., led officers to stop a car driven by Orlando Bell. They found a gun in his pants pocket a

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Emmanuel BELL First Lieutenant (O-2), U.S. Marine Corps

ED KINKEADE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Corey Jevon Bell's Motion to Suppress (the "Motion") (Doc. No. 135). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on April 3, 2019. As the Court noted in its minute entry for the hearing (Doc. No. 157), its order was forthcoming. After considering the Motion, the response to the Motion, the arguments and evidence presented at the suppression hearing, and the applicabl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D MAR 2 2 2013 Clerk, U.s. marin § B, > UNlTED sTATEs oF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Criminal NO. 05-0100-3 (PLF) ) GREGORY BELL, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM oPlNIoN This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendant Gregory Bell to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The defendant’s g g motion [Dkt. No. 1551] was filed on the docket of this Court on September 8, 2015. His supplemental motion [Dkt

ORDER For years Eddie Bell and other gang members sold crack cocaine on the west side of Chicago. He was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and using a telephone to *574commit felony drug crimes, id. § 843(b). His guidelines imprisonment range was 360 months to life. The district court sentenced him to 3Ó0 months, well below tha

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On November 17, 2016, after a state court suppressed the prosecution’s evidence and threw out firearms charges against defendant Charles Bell (“Bell” or “defendant”), the United States of America (the- “Government”) sought and obtained an indictment charging defendant with new, 'federal crimes based o

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600066 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. LARRY R. BELL Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In a superseding indictment, defendant Robert Apperson, along with eight co-conspirators, has been indicted for distributing heroin and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. At the center of the alleged conspiracy is Ra’Sonne Amealo Bell, who purchased heroin and cocaine from Richard Jamal Sol

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 38, 44 WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Count Four of the indictment in this case charges defendants Donnie Bell, Dwight Hart, and Antonio Johnson with using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The indictment alleges two crime of violence predicates

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Todd Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ((2012) motion and denying his motion for judicial review in the interest of justice, which was

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Bell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Bell has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therei

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in.this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Kenroy Bell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge On October 24, 2013, a jury convicted defendants Kenneth Bell and Antonio Walter of a conspiracy to distribute heroin lasting from 2007 until in or around November of 2010. Before me is Bell’s fourth motion for a new trial, in which Walter joins, which argues that new evidence — a letter that Edmund Forrest, one of seven cooperating

PER CURIAM: After finding that Andrew Bell had violated the terms of his supervised release by committing the crime of arson, the District Court revoked his release and sentenced him to prison for a term of 60 months. He appeals the District Court’s decision, arguing that the court erred by admitting hearsay statements at his revocation hearing without first applying the balancing test laid out by United States v. Frazie

*756 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucldo, United States District Judge On October 24, 2013, a jury convicted defendants Kenneth Bell and Antonio Walter of a conspiracy to distribute heroin that lasted from 2007 until in or about November of 2010. Before me is defendants’ motion for a new trial, which argues that the government vio

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge On October 24, 2013, a jury convicted defendants Kenneth Bell and Antonio Walter of a conspiracy to distribute heroin. Before me is Bell’s renewed motion for a new trial, which defendant Walter joins,1 in which Bell reasserts one of the claims he raised in his post-trial motion for judgment

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS,' Chief Judge Petitioner Jasmine Bell moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence arguing that his attorney provided ineffective assistance by not complying with his instruction to file a notice of appeal. The government opposes Bell’s motion arguing that Bell did not ask his att