Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Behan”
MEMORANDUM JOAN N. FEENEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The matters before the Court are 1) the Motion, filed by the Intervenor-Defendant, Philip J. Behan (the “Debtor”) for Judgment on the Pleadings; 2) the Cross Motion by Debora Casey, Chapter 7 Trustee, for Summary Judgment against the Inter-venor-Defendant; and 3) the Trustee’s Motion for Summary Judgment against the Trustees of t
United States v. Behanpublic domain
110 U.S. 338 (1884) UNITED STATES v. BEHAN. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 18th, 1883. Decided February 4th, 1884. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *339 Mr. Solicitor-General (Mr. John S. Blair was with him) for appellant. Mr. J.W. Douglass for appellee. MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY d
United States v. Kellypublic domain
Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted Staff Sergeant (SSgt) Bruce L. Kelly, pursuant to his conditional pleas, of disobeying a general order and possession of child pornography, in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 934 (2006).
United States v. Behanpublic domain
Mr. Justice Bradley delivered the opinion February 4,1884, adopting the language used by the court below.
Patricia L. Cohen, Presiding Judge Introduction The Firemen’s Retirement System of St. Louis (FRS) appeals the trial court’s judgment reversing the decision of the Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Retirement System (Board) to deny Mark Behan’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. On appeal, Mr. Behan claims that the trial c
Schlosser v. Behanpublic domain
722 So.2d 1129 (1998) Charles E. SCHLOSSER, Jr. v. Verna Mary Simon BEHAN. No. 98-CA-280 Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. November 25, 1998. Robert G. Creely, Gretna, Louisiana, Jana E. Smith, Metairie, Louisiana and Gail D. Schlosser, Jefferson, Louisiana, for plaintiffappellee. Sandra S. Salley, Metairie, Louisiana, for defendant-appellant.
Fisher v. Behanpublic domain
MEYERS, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendant American Yacht Harbor, Inc.'s ("Yacht Harbor") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. This action involves a claim by Plaintiffs Richard and Kathryn Fisher ("the Fishers") that Yacht Harbor should be liable for injuries they sustained during an alleged attack by Defendant Chris Behan ("Behan"). To rule on the Motion for Summar
United States v. New Yorkpublic domain
255 F.Supp.2d 73 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. State of NEW YORK, George E. Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Brian J. Wing, Acting New York State Commissioner of Social Services, Barbara A. DeBuono, New York State Commissioner of Public Health, James L. Stone, New York State Commissioner of Mental Health, Thomas A. Maul, New York State Commissioner of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Richard P. Mills,
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States of America v. Allan Wolfe Pressman and Allen Lee Behanpublic domain
ORDER Before WRIGHT, GOODWIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. After this appeal had been submitted for decision, but before the opinion had been filed, the defendants purged themselves of contempt and mooted the appeal. After our decision was filed, the defendants advised this court, by a motion to recall the mandate, that the appeal was moot, and requested that it
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States of America v. Allan Wolfe Pressman and Allen Lee Behanpublic domain
PER CURIAM: After a grant of immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6001 et seq. the appellants refused to testify before a grand jury and were found in contempt of court and ordered committed. They appeal the judgment of contempt. Because both appellants were already in federal custody serving
Siren v. Behanpublic domain
224 N.J. Super. 130 (1988) 539 A.2d 1244 FRANCES SIREN, SUBSTITUTE EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD L. SIREN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH BEHAN, VOLKSWAGEN-WERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, A.G., VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC., WORLD WIDE VOLKSWAGEN, INC., PIKE VOLKSWAGEN, INC., STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER, TOWNSHIP OF WINSLOW, COUNTY OF CAMDEN AND JAMES P. BEHAN, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIV
United States v. State of New Yorkpublic domain
3 F.Supp.2d 298 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, George E. Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Brian J. Wing, Acting New York State Commissioner of Social Services, Barbara A. DeBuono, New York State Commissioner of Public Health, James L. Stone, New York State Commissioner of Mental Health, Thomas A. Maul, New York State Commissioner of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Richard P. Mills, N
263 F.Supp.2d 82 (2003) NATIONAL WRESTLING COACHES ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. No. CIV.02-0072 EGS. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 11, 2003. *84 Lawrence J. Joseph, Esq., Robert A. Matthews, Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Washington, DC, Co
Hastetter v. Behanpublic domain
MR. JUSTICE DALY delivered the opinion of the Court. This action is based on the defendants’ alleged violation of the plaintiffs right to privacy as provided in Art. II, § 10,1972 Mont. Const., and the defendant’s alleged violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted by the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, in and for the County of McCone. Plaintiff appeals th
Behan v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION. Richardson, J., delivered the opinion of the court: The claimant was one of the sureties on the bond of a contractor who had entered into an agreement with the defendants to perform certain work on a public improvement on the Mississippi River, in the harbor of New Orleans. The contractor having failed to prosecute the work to the satisfaction of the defendants’ o
Behan v. Commissionerpublic domain
THOMAS W. BEHAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.Behan v. CommissionerDocket No. 75428.United States Board of Tax Appeals
Crist v. Behanpublic domain
538 F.2d 323 Cristv.Behan No. 75-2094 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 5/24/76 1 D.Md. AFFIRMED
Behan v. City of Doverpublic domain
419 F.Supp. 562 (1976) Cuthbert J. BEHAN, III, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DOVER et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 75-38. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 24, 1976. *563 Myron T. Steele and David B. Ripsom of Prickett, Ward, Burt & Sanders, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff. Nicholas H. Rodriguez of Schmittinger
United States v. Oscar Bentpublic domain
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Oscar Bent, a Colombian juvenile, was arrested by Coast Guard officers in July 1981 on board the “ROBIN”, a sixty-foot American shrimp trawler anchored twenty miles south of Cape Romano, Florida. A fishing moratorium was in effect in the waters surrounding the remote Cape Romano area, and the ROBIN
United States v. Julio Perezpublic domain
R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Julio Perez, was charged and, after a jury trial, convicted for knowingly and willfully, and with intent to defraud, possessing falsely made and counterfeit obligations of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472 (West 1976). 1 The trial judge sentenced Pere