Cases

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE, D.J. SMITH Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT A. BECERRA PRIVATE FIRST CLASS (E-2), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201400077 SPECI

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Alfredo Garcia Becerra (Garcia) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Ramiro Becerra appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 12-month sen*642tence for bail jumping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Becerra’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to with

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo Garcia Becerra raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007),

MEMORANDUM ** Efrain Becerra-Lopez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 144-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Becerra-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as c

MEMORANDUM ** Efrain Becerra-Lopez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 144-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Becerra-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as c

MEMORANDUM** Alvaro Becerra, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his motion to correct an illegal pre-Guidelines sentence pursuant to former Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) on the ground that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the jury made no findings as to drug quantity, and his 40-year sentence exceeded the statutory maximum set forth in 21 U.S.

MEMORANDUM ** Anastacio Becerra-Cortez appeals his 46-month sentence imposed after he pled *482guilty to the offense of being an Alien in the United States after Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We review Becerra-Cortez’s 46-month sentence for reasonableness.

MEMORANDUM ** Ramiro Becerra Mendoza appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed upon his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *842As the government concedes, we remand to the sentencing court for further proc

MEMORANDUM ** Alberto Beeerra-Sandoval appeals from the district court’s judgment and 63-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), as enhanced by (b)(2). Beeerra-Sandoval contends that his conviction should be reversed because the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(g) w

MEMORANDUM ** Ramiro Becerra Mendoza appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed upon his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *842As the government concedes, we remand to the sentencing court for further proc

MEMORANDUM*** Adolfo Becerra-Plazola appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Becerra-Plazola’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of r

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-10654 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-02-00062-RCC- EFRAIN BECERRA-GARCIA, BPV Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

OPINION GRAHAM, District Judge. Defendant-Appellant Teodoro Becerra-Garcia was charged by indictment filed on February 4, 1999, in the Western District of Tennessee, with one count of illegally re-entering the United States after being deported subsequent to the commission of a felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and four other offenses involving the possession or use of false or stolen identification docu

MEMORANDUM * We affirm the conviction and sentence entered by the district court. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here. Assuming the district court erred during the plea colloquy by fading to inform Becerra-Sandoval of the “found in” element of the charged offense, the error was harmless as Becerra-Sandoval had previously indicated his awareness of

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: After a long and somewhat distorted journey, this case now reaches us on appeal for the second time. See United States v. Leal, 74 F.3d 600, 607-08 (5th Cir.1996). In the first appeal, a prior panel affirmed the convictions of Ruben Gil Becerra (“Becerra”), Aureliano Salinas, Sr. (“Salinas, Sr.”), Aureliano Salinas, Jr. (“Salin

155 F.3d 740 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant,v.Ruben Gil BECERRA, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,andAureliano Salinas, Sr.; Aureliano Salinas, Jr.; AlbericoSalinas; Victor Leal; Jorge Luis Ramirez,Defendants-Cross-Appellees. No. 96-40569. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Sept. 16, 1998.

91 F.3d 161 U.S.v.Becerra* NO. 94-3599 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. June 26, 1996 Appeal From: N.D.Fla., No. 94-03067-RV 1 AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2403 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellee v. Erik Becerra lllllllllll

66 F.3d 323 U.S.v.Becerra* NO. 94-50637 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug 17, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. A-94-CR-79 1 AFFIRMED.