Cases

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Jasaan Bastían pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kenneth M. Karas, Judge) to conspiracy to distribute crack in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(A), and to using and possessing a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). He now appeals from

13‐1156‐cr United States v. Bastian UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: September 3, 2014 Decided: October 29, 2014) Docket No. 13‐1156‐cr

MEMORANDUM * Desmone Bastían appeals his conviction, and denial of a new trial, on charges that he violated 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2). We affirm. Bastian’s argument that the evidence was insufficient turns on his view that Sandra Maas’s testimony was incredible. However, we will not overturn a jury’s credibility determination unless the testimony is incredible or unsubstantial on its face.

*463BENTON, Circuit Judge. Casey J. Bastían pled guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a child in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a) and (e), and one count of receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2)(A) and (b)(1). Five days after the district court1 accepted his plea, Bastían moved to withdraw it. This mo

MEMORANDUM * Desmone Bastían appeals his conviction, and denial of a new trial, on charges that he violated 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2). We affirm. Bastian’s argument that the evidence was insufficient turns on his view that Sandra Maas’s testimony was incredible. However, we will not overturn a jury’s credibility determination unless the testimony is incredible or unsubstantial on its face.

650 F.Supp.2d 849 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Casey BASTIAN, Defendant. No. 08-CR-1327-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. August 20, 2009. *853 Mark A. Tremmel, U.S. Attorney's Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff. SENTENCING MEMORANDUM LINDA R. READE, Chi

112 F.Supp.2d 378 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, v. Teddy BASTIAN, Defendant. No. S1 00 CR 281(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 12, 2000. *379 DECISION AND ORDER MARRERO, District Judge. Defendant Teddy Bastian is charged in a two count indictment with possession of a firearm

782 F.2d 1054 U.S.v.Bastian 85-3062 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 1/22/86 1 D.Wash. AFFIRMED

506 F.2d 1395 U. S.v.Bastian 74-2121 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 11/26/74 1 E.D.N.Y. AFFIRMED

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Andri Bastían, a native and citizen of Indonesia, seeks review of a final order of removal issued by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Specifically, Mr. Bastían is appealing the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his application for asylum based on his Chinese ethnicity and his Christian religion.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

AMENDED ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In a case of first impression, five policyholders contend that four insurance companies do not fully compensate their Florida auto insurance policyholders when their vehicles are totaled because the insurers reimburse only the amount of sales, tax actually incurred in buyi

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Stanley A. Bastian, United States District Judge Before the Court is the United States' Motion to Partially Dismiss Case For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, ECF No. 10. A hearing on the motion was held on October 31, 2018, in Spokane, Washington. Plaintiff was represented by John M. Colvin. *1064The United States was re

Ultimately, the court held that the administrative search at issue is not the least intrusive consistent with current technology because an x-ray machine is less intrusive than a hand search. The court further held that Defendants did not have adequate notice of the actual search and did not manifest their consent to the search. Accordingly, the magistrate court held that the warrantless administrative searches were illegal and suppressed evidence uncovered

Stanley A. Bastian, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 37. Defendant requests the Court dismiss the Indictment filed on July 3, 2018, charging Defendant with illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326(a). ECF No. 21. The Court held a hearing on October 31, 2018. William Miles Pope appeared on behalf of Defendant, who was present in the courtroom, and Matthew Duggan appeared on

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge In a case of first impression, five policyholders contend that four insurance companies do not fully compensate their Florida auto insurance policyholders when their vehicles are totaled because the insurers reimburse only the amount of sales tax actually incurred in buying replacement vehicles rather than the full

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.