Cases

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clarence Bassett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a judicial inquiry and seeking an evidentiary hearing on the Government’s refusal to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clarence Bassett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a judicial inquiry and seeking an evidentiary hearing on the Government’s refusal to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VRATIL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Suppress Statement (Doc. #30) filed September 15, 1993. I. Background On March 11, 1993, Alaing Guillott, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary in Leavenworth, wrote to the United States Probation Office (“Probation Office”) i

Affirmed.

OPINION WALLS, Senior District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Ronald B. Bassett (“Petitioner”) moves to vacate, correct, or set aside his federal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket Entries 8 and 10). Respondent United States of America (“Respondent”) opposes the motion. (Docket Entry 16). For the reasons stated herein and for the reasons expressed on the record at the March 16, 2016 e

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Case below, 519 Fed.Appx. 640.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

632 F.Supp. 1308 (1986) UNITED STATES of America v. Ronald Burnell BASSETT, Clarence Meredith. Crim. No. M-85-0541. United States District Court, D. Maryland. April 11, 1986. Breckinridge L. Willcox, U.S. Atty., and Harvey Eisenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. Ronald Rubinstein, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for defendant Bassett. Leslie A.

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Ray Anthony Bassett was convicted of conspiracy to commit bank robbery, possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appeals, arguing the evidence was insufficient to convict him of conspiracy and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence. He also contends that the district

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-709L (E-Filed: January 26, 2018) ) BASSETT, NEW MEXICO LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Takings; Claim Alleging Denial of ) Access to Real Property; RCFC v.

688 F.2d 851 ***U. S.v.Bassett 81-7793 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Eleventh Circuit 9/7/82 1 M.D.Ga. AFFIRMED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

PER CURIAM. Brian Bassett appeals the 90-month sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2), and transporting and shipping child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(l) and (b)(1). Bassett argues that the d

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-3202 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

JEFFREY L. VIKEN, CHIEF JUDGE INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Annie Tovares filed an action against the defendants Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., and Praetorian Insurance Company alleging bad faith and misrepresentation in violation of South Dakota law. (Docket 1). Defendants filed separate answers to plaintiff's complaint.1 (Dockets 37 & 39). Defendants filed a motion for

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until December 3, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.