Cases

09-3035-cr USA v. Barrie UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2010 (Submitted: August 25, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010) Docket No. 09-3035-cr _______________

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CO-42 ISMAHIL BARRIE, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, AP

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

887 A.2d 29 (2005) Yusuf BARRIE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 02-CF-319. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted November 3, 2005. Decided November 23, 2005. *30 Sylvia F. Hardy, appointed by the court, was on the brief for appellant. Kenneth L. Wainstein, United States Attorney, Joh

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Isatu Barrie, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of a February 6, 2009 order of the BIA denying her motion to reopen. In re Isatu Barrie, No. A095 460 140 (B.I.A. Feb. 6, 2009). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We lack jurisdiction over Barrie’s claim that the BIA erred by refusing to reopen

597 F.Supp.2d 1235 (2009) George W. BARRIE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, and Final Adjudication Branch, Defendants. Civil Case No. 07-cv-01751-LTB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. January 29, 2009.

AMBRO, Circuit Judge, Dissenting. Mamadu Billo Barrie5 took part in a strike in Guinea, was detained for a month, bribed his way to freedom (ie., was never officially granted release), and escaped to this country. He applied for asylum, with-bolding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. The Immigration Judge found him not credible for purposes of his asylum c

SUMMARY ORDER Bailor Barrie petitions for review of a June 27, 2005 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming a January 28, 2004 order of Immigration Judge George T. Chew (the “U”), denying Barrie’s claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). See In re Bailor Barrie, No. A96 248 777 (B.I.A. June 27, 2005), aff'g No. A96 248 777 (Immig

AMBRO, Circuit Judge, Dissenting. Mamadu Billo Barrie5 took part in a strike in Guinea, was detained for a month, bribed his way to freedom (ie., was never officially granted release), and escaped to this country. He applied for asylum, with-bolding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. The Immigration Judge found him not credible for purposes of his asylum c

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Mohamed Yallen Barrie, who is asserted to be a citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of the April 6, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the October 20, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Joanna Miller Bukszpan, denying petitioner’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Mohamed Yallen Barrie, No. A 95 467 714 (B.I.A. Apr. 6, 200

SUMMARY ORDER Osman Barrie, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of a September 29, 2006, order of the BIA affirming the November 1, 2004, decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Douglas B. Schoppert denying Barrie’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the CAT. In re Osman Barrie, No. A79 328 605 (B.I.A. Sept. 29, 2006), aff'g No. A79 328 605 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City Nov

SUMMARY ORDER Abdul Barrie, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of a February 29, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the April 7, 2006 decision of Immigration *425Judge (“IJ”) George Chew, who denied his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Abdul Barrie, No. A95 147 465 (B.

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Isatu Barrie, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of a February 6, 2009 order of the BIA denying her motion to reopen. In re Isatu Barrie, No. A095 460 140 (B.I.A. Feb. 6, 2009). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We lack jurisdiction over Barrie’s claim that the BIA erred by refusing to reopen

SUMMARY ORDER Abdul Barrie, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of a February 29, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the April 7, 2006 decision of Immigration *425Judge (“IJ”) George Chew, who denied his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Abdul Barrie, No. A95 147 465 (B.

*68 SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Mohamed Barrie, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, seeks review of a September 28, 2005 order of the BIA affirming the April 20, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Patricia A. Rohan denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Mohamed Barrie, No. A

SUMMARY ORDER Ibrahim Barrie, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history. Where, as here, the BIA affirms an IJ’s adverse credibility finding by stating that one particular inconsistency is sufficient alone

OPINION OF THE COURT JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. The issue before us is whether the district court erred in enhancing Jane Dura Barrie’s sentencing offense level by four levels for organizing or leading a criminal activity that involved five or more participants. 1 We hold that it did.

Opinion by Judge REINHARDT. Before: REINHARDT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, * District Judge. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Once again, we are called upon to review a conviction obtained by the government as a result of its four-year sting operation