Cases

21-1379 United States v. Barrett In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2023 No. 21-1379 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DWAYNE BARRETT, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 3, AKA TALL MAN, Defendant-Appel

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 19, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CI

14‐2641‐cr United States v. Barrett In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2015 No. 14‐2641‐cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DWAYNE BARRETT, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 3, AKA TALL MAN, Defend

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3405 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Barrett Prelogar De

21-1379 United States v. Barrett 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 AUGUST TERM 2023 6 No. 21-1379 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 Appellee, 9 v. 10 DWAYNE BARRETT, AKA SEALED DEFEN

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Bryan Randall Barrett has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barrett has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec

12‐4663(L) United States v. Barrett 12‐4663(L) United States v. Barret 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2015 6 7 (Argued: January 6, 2016 Decided

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge On March 11, 2015, a grand jury in the Eastern District of New York returned an indictment charging Andrew Barrett (“defendant”), a licensed pharmacist, with health care fraud, six counts of submitting false claims to the United States, eight counts of money laundering involving the proceeds of the charged health care fraud, • three counts of fili

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Defendant Kenneth Barrett was sentenced to death after being convicted in federal court on two counts of felony murder and one count of intentionally killing a state law-enforcement officer. We affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Barrett, 496 F.3d 1079 (10th Cir.2007). Defendant then filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cedric Tyrone Barrett seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

CCA 201000330. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER CONTESTED ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATIONS THAT FAIL TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE AN ARTICLE 134 TERMINAL ELEMENT BUT THAT WERE NOT CHALLENGED AT TRIAL STATE AN OFFENSE. No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

*BAKER, Chief Judge (dissenting): Consistent with my views in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), and United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent.

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Defendant Michael Barrett appeals his convictions and sentence on drug and gun charges stemming from two separate arrests, the first in connection with a police search of an apartment and the second in connection with a police search of Barrett’s car. Barrett was convicted of possession of heroin, cocaine base, and marijuana; possession of a firearm in furtherance of

SUMMARY ORDER Following the district court’s denial of Defendant-Appellant Randy Barrett’s motion seeking to dismiss the indictment on May 20, 2009, 2009 WL 1457022, Barrett entered a conditional plea on August 17, 2009 to a charge for failing to update his registration as a sex offender pursuant to *630the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA” or “the Act”),

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Willie Barrett appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Barrett, No. 4:04-cr-00087-H-3 (E.D.N.C

552 F.3d 724 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ashkelon BARRETT, Appellant. No. 08-1304. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 23, 2008. Filed: January 14, 2009. *725 John Bishop, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant. Charles J. Williams, AUSA, argued, Daniel C

496 F.3d 1079 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Eugene BARRETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-7005. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 25, 2007. *1080 *1081 *1082 Mark Henricksen, Henricksen & Henricksen Lawy

ORDER Gregory Barrett pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court found that Barrett qualified as an armed career criminal, id. § 924(e)(1), and sentenced him to 186 months’ imprisonment. Barrett filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer now moves to withdraw because he cannot discern a nonfrivolous basis for the appeal. See Anders v. California, </

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Frank Barrett appeals the district court’s Nov. 16, 2000 decision denying his motion for an injunction to stay auction of his seized property by the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”). Barrett and his attorney received notice of impending forfeiture on Dec. 4, 1998, stating that he would have 20 days f

198 F.Supp.2d 1046 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Marcus Neal BARRETT, Defendant. No. CRIM. 00-111. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa. April 4, 2002. *1047 Richard L. Richards, Asst. U.S. Atty., Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff. James Whalen, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant. ORDER P