Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Barnier”
Barnier v. Raineypublic domain
890 So.2d 357 (2004) Pamela Romans BARNIER, Appellant, v. Russell A. RAINEY and Farm Bureau Insurance, Appellees. No. 1D03-5105. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 20, 2004. *358 Paul Bruce Brockway of Steven A. Bagen & Associates, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellant. Dennis Dabroski of Dennis D
Barnier v. Statepublic domain
67 P.3d 320 (2003) Michael John BARNIER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 38657. Supreme Court of Nevada. April 28, 2003. Steven G. McGuire, State Public Defender, James P. Logan, Chief Deputy Public Defender, and Susan M. Reaser, Deputy Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant. Brian Sandoval, Attorney General, Carson City; Philip H. Dun
Barnier v. Szentmiklosipublic domain
810 F.2d 594 55 USLW 2511, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 697 Daniel BARNIER, Plaintiff,Marie Barnier, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,v.William SZENTMIKLOSI, Peter Campbell, City of Milan PoliceDepartment, and City of Milan,Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees. Nos. 83-1265, 83-1311. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.
Barnier v. Szentmiklosipublic domain
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge. Defendants, police officers Szentmiklosi and Campbell, the police department, and the City of Milan, Michigan, appeal a malicious prosecution judgment in favor of plaintiff, Marie Barnier, on two grounds: (1) erroneous admission of a polygraph test, and (2) insufficient evidence to support the verdict. Barnier cross-appeals, challenging the district court’s denial of treble damages against the City o
Barnier v. Szentmiklosipublic domain
565 F.Supp. 869 (1983) Daniel B. BARNIER, Marie Barnier and Timothy Barnier, Plaintiffs, v. William SZENTMIKLOSI, Peter Campbell, City of Milan Police Department and City of Milan, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-60095. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. June 9, 1983. *870 Bruce Wallace, Hooper, Hathaway, Price, Beuche
United States v. Robert Burstonpublic domain
*865STRANCH, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which CARR, D.J., joined, and BOGGS, J., joined in part. BOGGS, J. (pp. 886-87), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part from Section II.A.2 of the majority opinion. OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. In this joint direct criminal appeal, Brya
United States v. Lorne Semraupublic domain
OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Dr. Lome Semrau appeals his conviction of three counts of healthcare fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347. Among other issues, Dr. Semrau argues — on a matter of first impression in any jurisdiction — that results from a functional magnetic resonance imaging (“fMRI”) lie detection test should have been admitted t
United States v. Matusoff Rental Co.public domain
494 F.Supp.2d 740 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MATUSOFF RENTAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 3:99cv626. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 30, 2007. *741 Bill Lann Lee, Dale Ann Goldberg, United States Attorney's Office, Dayton, OH, Donald Walker Tunnage, Isabelle M. Thabault, Jo
George Family Trust ex rel. George v. United Statespublic domain
*181 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. Before this court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the consolidated actions of plaintiffs The George Family Trust (the “George Trust”) and The Elizabeth Stone Trust (the “Stone Trust”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). The two plaintiff trusts and the individu
United States v. Jerry Preston Thomas, Jr.public domain
OPINION NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Jerry Preston Thomas, Jr. appeals his re-sentencing on remand for marijuana-related convictions on the grounds that (1) the 29-month delay from remand to final sentencing violated his due process rights, (2) the district court erred in attributing 1,000 pounds of marijuana to him for sentencing
United States v. Ralph Hubert Bargerpublic domain
HIGGINS, District Judge. This case involves an appeal by Ralph Hubert Barger from his jury conviction for conspiracy to violate federal explosives, firearms and arson laws and to convert a thing of value of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and for knowingly converting a copy of the official law enforcement intelligence manual regarding the identities and persona
United States Ex Rel. Graber v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
8 F.Supp.2d 343 (1998) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Bracha GRABER, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, The Human Resources Administration of the City of New York, The Department of Social Services of the City of New York, The Child Welfare Administration of the City of New York, The State of New York, and The State Department of Social Services, Defendants. No. 93 Civ. 8984 DC. United States Distri
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Defendants Keith Sherlin (No. 94-6111) and Tracy Teague (No. 94-6112) appeal their convictions. We affirm in each case. Both were named in a seven-count superseding indictment filed on April 28, 1994, which included charges of conspiracy to commit arson in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i), arson with personal injuries
United States v. Joseph D. Harris A/K/A Sonny Joe Harris (92-1455) Alton Kilbourn (92-1457)public domain
RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendants, Joseph Harris and Alton Kilb-ourn, appeal their convictions for their roles in the attempted purchase of cocaine from undercover federal agents. Defendants raise six issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court erred by failing to conclude that Harris was entrapped as a matter of law; (2) wheth*496er prejudicial error
United States v. Carmine Guanti, Arnold Romano, Dominick Romano and Frank Sherbicki,appellantspublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge: The defendants Carmine Guanti, Arnold Romano, Dominick Romano and Frank Sherbicki appeal from judgments of conviction following a two-week trial before court and jury. The indictment filed in 1964, charged in a single count twelve defendants and sixteen named co-conspirators with conspiracy to violate the Fede
United States v. Joseph Armone, Stephen Grammauta, Vincent Pacelli, and Nicholas Viscardipublic domain
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Four defendants appeal from convictions of violating the conspiracy provision of the federal narcotics laws, 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174. The single-count indictment named twenty-eight co-conspirators, twelve of whom were charged *390
Hoskins v. Citigroup, Inc. (In Re Viola)public domain
469 B.R. 1 (2012) In re Joseph J. VIOLA aka Giuseppe Viola, Debtor. Janina M. Hoskins, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant, v. Citigroup, Inc.; Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.; Citibank, N.A., Appellees. BAP No. NC-11-1173-DoDH. Bankruptcy No. 10-30904. Adversary No. 10-03103. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted on January 20, 2012.</
Orton v. Hoffman (In Re Kayne)public domain
453 B.R. 372 (2011) In re Karen V. KAYNE, Debtor. Gregory B. Orton, Appellant, v. Timothy W. Hoffman, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. BAP No. NC-10-1297-PaJuH, Bankruptcy No. 09-12470. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and submitted on June 16, 2011. Decided July 1, 2011. *375
In re: Herbert M. Zukerkorn Jennifer Zukerkornpublic domain
FILED DEC 19 2012 1 SUSAN M SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL 2 ORDERED PUBLISHED O F TH E N IN TH C IR C U IT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4
Buchanan v. Sotopublic domain
Opinion BENKE, J. Defendant and appellant Ramon Soto (Ramon) 1 appeals an order denying his motions to (1) vacate entry of default and default judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 473 and (2) quash service of summons and d