Cases

Opinion PER CURIAM. This unhappy child custody litigation gives rise to two appeals. Docket number AC 23642 is the appeal by the defendant mother, Karla Joy Banach, from the trial court’s denial of her motion for visitation and its granting of her attorney’s motion to withdraw. Docket number AC 23786 is the defendant’s appeal from the denial of her motion to compel her former attorney to supply porti

BY JUDGE JAMES H. CHAMBLIN This case came before the Court on July 22,2004, and January 31,2005, for trial without a jury on claims of breach of contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment. After consideration of the evidence, the argument of counsel, and the memoranda filed, I find that the Defendants, Jack Banach and Suzanne Banach, are personally liable to the Plaintiffs, J. Andrew Luce, D.V.M., and Aimee Luce,

812 A.2d 435 (2002) 356 N.J. Super. 342 Peter BANACH, Plaintiff, v. Jamie CANNON, et al., Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Monmouth County. Decided June 24, 2002. *436 Robert L. Witek, II, Long Branch, for plaintiff, (Resnikoff, Resnikoff & Witek, attorneys). James W. Miskowski, Ridge

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF/RELATOR’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JEFFREY T. MILLER, United States District Judge Defendants Quality Assurance Services, Inc. (“QAS”), Glenn Russell Deacon, Glenn *1024Russell Deacon II, Susan Deacon, and Shelly Becker (collectively, “Defendants”) move the court

648 A.2d 1363 (1994) STATE v. Stanley BANACH. No. 93-598-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. October 27, 1994. *1365 Jeffrey Pine, Atty. Gen., Jane McSoley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff. Richard Casparian, Public Defender, Catherine Gibran, Paula Rosin, Asst. Public Defenders, for defendant. OPINION

The plaintiffs are Karen and Danny Keel, parents of Justin Keel, who was born on January 18, 1985, with severe multiple congenital abnormalities. Justin died in February 1991, at the age of six. The defendants are Warren Banach, M.D., who was Karen's doctor and who performed the sonographic examinations of the fetus, and his professional corporation. The Keels charged the defendants with medical malpractice in failing to discover several severe, life-threatening fetal abnormalities th

140 Ill. App.3d 327 (1986) 489 N.E.2d 363 In re MARRIAGE OF MARIA BANACH, Petitioner-Appellant, and JOHN BANACH, Respondent-Appellee. No. 84-0695. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed January 17, 1986. *328 *329 Douglas P. Trent and R. Mark Maritote, both o

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASTEL, District Judge. Defendant Alex Yücel moves to dismiss Count II of the Superseding Indictment (the “SI Indictment,” Dkt. No. 9) on the grounds that the statute under which he is charged, 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A), is void for vagueness as applied to him.1 For the following reasons, the motion is denied. BACKGROUND Yücel is

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1892C Filed: November 30, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * BES DESIGN/BUILD, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v.

552 F.3d 550 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jasper VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-2026. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 29, 2008. Decided December 31, 2008. *551 Richard N. Cox (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Urban, IL, for Plaintiff-Ap

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-2026 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASPER V ARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 05 CR 20007—Michael P. McCuskey, Chief Judge. A

277 Md. 502 (1976) 356 A.2d 242 BANACH ET AL. v. STATE OF MARYLAND COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS [No. 133, September Term, 1975.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided April 14, 1976. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and O'DONNELL,[*] JJ. Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr.,

31 Wis.2d 320 (1966) BANACH and wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. May 13, 1966. June 7, 1966. *325 For the appellants there were briefs and oral argument by Burton A. Strnad of Milwaukee. For the respondent there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff-appellant, Herbert Dellenbach, brought suit for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that the five defendants — two state judges, a court commissioner, and two court reporters— had violated his right to due process by interfering with the appea

909 F.Supp. 1426 (1995) Barbara GESS, et al., John Roberts, Sr., et al., Joseph Givens, et al., Patrick G. Roberts, et al., Steven Fowler, et al., David Barber, et al., Jay Dehaai, et al., Cheryl Pretiger Toms, et al., Alphonso Barnes, et al., Joseph Warrick, et al., Connie Mullen, et al., Donald Gregory Sharpe, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 93-D-0913-N, 93-D-1139-N, 93-D-1140-

Bkowning, Judge: Upon application of the petitioner, Frank J. Banach, this Court issued a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum on May 5, 1963, returnable June 18, 1963, and appointed counsel to represent him before this Court. The petition alleges petitioner’s indictment and conviction at the March, 1960, term of the Circuit Court of Wayne County, the overruling of his motion for a new trial and the imposit

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. Appellant, Leo Leonard Banach, sought release from confinement- in the Federal Penitentiary by writ of habeas corpus. He had a full and complete hearing in the court below and has appealed from the order and judgment of the court discharging the writ and remanding him to the custody of ap-pellee. Appellant was indicted in three separate indictments in the United States District Cour

848 F.Supp. 962 (1994) Claire Abigail BASTEN, By and Through her next friend, Jonathan A. BASTEN; Jonathan A. Basten; Kathie J. Basten, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 92-H-1417-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D. March 21, 1994. *963 *964 Pittma

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED NATIONAL MAINTENANCE, No. 12-56809 INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02172- v. AJB-JMA SAN DIEGO CONVENTION CENTER, INC., a California corporation, ORDER AND Defendant-Appell

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED NATIONAL MAINTENANCE, No. 12-56809 INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02172- v. AJB-JMA SAN DIEGO CONVENTION CENTER, INC., a California corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appel