Cases

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

544 U.S. 923 BAKOWSKIv.KURIMAI ET AL. No. 04-1006. Supreme Court of United States. March 21, 2005. 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Christopher Bakow-ski appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing his malicious prosecution claim. In 1994, Bakowski was indicted on charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States Air Force (“USAF”) and making false statements. He was acquitted of these charges on October 31, 1995. In November 1998, Bakowski filed a complaint against fifteen federal employees and three federal agencies al

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff Christopher L. Bakowski, appeals pro se from the District Court’s dismissal of his amended complaint,1 which contained tort claims against various federal agencies and officers. Plaintiff contends that he suffered psychological injuries a

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

52 P.3d 1179 (2002) 2002 UT 62 Mark BAKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. MOUNTAIN STATES STEEL, INC., Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee, v. Voest-Alpine Services & Technologies Corp., Third-Party Defendant, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant. No. 20000608. Supreme Court of Utah. July 9, 2002.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position

350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black

22-843-cv Doe v. United States United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Submitted: May 16, 2023 Decided: August 1, 2023 No. 22-843 JANE DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

22-843-cv Doe v. United States United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Submitted: May 16, 2023 Decided: August 1, 2023 Amended: August 4, 2023 No. 22-843 JANE DOE,

Dillard, Judge. Lawrence W. Hall appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Prosero, Inc., formerly known as FacilityPro.com Corp. (“Prosero”), on Prosero’s suit to recover on a promissory note executed by Hall. Hall contends on appeal that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Prosero when genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether the note

Dillard, Chief Judge. These consolidated appeals involve various interfamilial disputes over the alleged mismanagement of a family business associated with a large estate. Specifically, Gary Rollins's four children, who are trustees of a marital trust established solely for the benefit of their mother (collectively, the "trustees"), sued LOR, Incorporated ("LOR"); their father, Gary;

HAGEN, Judge: ¶1 Adams and Smith Inc., Morgan Humphries, James L. Smith, and Dawn Smith (collectively, the company) appeal the district court's entry of judgment in favor of Gordon Willis and Jeffrey Darby. After resigning from employment with the company on January 20, 2015, Willis and Darby filed a complaint in the district court demanding that the company purchase their stock in

Opinion GREENWOOD, Senior Judge: [ 1 Everett P. Wilson Jr. and Darla Wilson appeal the trial court's order awarding a portion of interpleaded funds to Educators Mutual Insurance Association (EMIA). We reverse and remand. BACKGROUND 12 On September 19, 2010, the Wilsons' daughter, Jessica, was killed after hav

HAGEN, Judge: ¶1 ACC Capital Corporation (ACC) appeals the district court's denial of its motion for summary judgment and enforcement of a subsequent settlement agreement. The district court did not abuse its discretion in enforcing the settlement where the parties executed a Memorandum of Understanding (the MOU) during mediation, the terms of which were sufficiently definite to be enf

2022 UT App 73 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS AIRSTAR CORPORATION, Appellant, v. KEYSTONE AVIATION LLC AND SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, Appellees. Opinion No. 20190847-CA Filed June 16, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Royal I. Hansen

Katsas, Circuit Judge: In 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a rule allowing investment companies to post shareholder reports online and mail paper copies to shareholders upon request. The petitioners-a consumer-advocacy organization and representatives of the paper industry-argue that the SEC did not adequately consider the interests of shareholders who prefer repor

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal from the dismissal of a complaint presents two issues of first impression concerning the , Video Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2710. First, who is a “subscriber” (and therefore a “consumer”) under the Act? Second, what exactly is the “personally identifiable information” protected by the Act? We conclude that a person who - downloads an

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves a dispute over the scope of an insurance policy. The insureds, which we collectively identify as “BV,” obtained a mortgage on real property as security for a loan and acquired a title-insurance policy from Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. When the borrower defaulted, BV foreclosed on the property. But when a municipal

JUSTICE BAKOWSKI delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff Earl W. Hopewell (Hopewell) sued defendant Louis Vitullo (Vitullo), a partner of defendant Wildman, Harrold, Allen and Dixon (WHAD), for defamation. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss with prejudice pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Illinois C