Cases

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Walter Babb seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit *642justice or judge issues a certificate o

Affirmed by unpublished opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge KING joined. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. GREGORY, Circuit Judge: James Moore and Walter Babb were convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland for their participation in a large drug conspiracy which involved the use

PER CURIAM. Defendant-Appellant Toryano Lement Babb appeals from the district court’s decision denying his motion to suppress evidence during his bank robbery trial, that he claims was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. He contends that Michigan State Troopers had no reasonable suspicion to stop his car, and, in the alternative, he claims that troopers violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they subsequ

MEMORANDUM ** Janice Babb was convicted for stealing a total of $286,610.55 from the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). Babb claims on appeal that the sentencing court erred by (1) applying a two-point abuse of trust sentence. enhancement, and (2) ordering her to pay restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”) for theft that occurred prior to that statute’s date of enactment. We re

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Kevin Babb of conspiracy to distribute fifty grams or more of actual methamphetamine and three counts of distributing five grams or more of actual methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) & (B), and 846. The district court 1

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 503.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted limited to the following question: Whether the federal-sector provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which provides that personnel actions affecting agency employees aged 40 years or older shall be made free from any "discrimination based on age," 29 U.S.C. § 633a(a), requires a plaintiff to prove that age was a but-for cause of the c

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

The parties are directed to file supplemental letter briefs addressing the following question: What prospective administrative or judicial relief may a federal employee obtain under laws other than the ADEA, including under the civil service laws or the Constitution, against age-related policies, practices, actions, or statements that were not the but-for cause of an adverse employment action against the complaining employee? The briefs, not to exceed 10 page

Justice THOMAS, dissenting. Until now, the rule for pleading a claim under a federal antidiscrimination statute was clear: A plaintiff had to plausibly allege that discrimination was the but-for cause of an adverse action, unless the statute's text unequivocally replaced that standard with a different one. Today, however, the Court departs from this rule, concluding that the federal-sector provision of the Age Discrimination in Emp

ORDER HEMPHILL, District Judge. For decision here is the motion of the defendant, Michael Allen Babb, for an order suppressing a statement made November 2, 1977. For reasons set forth herein, defendant’s motion is denied. STATEMENT OF FACTS Defendant was indicted on November 8, 1977, in a one-count indictment charging him with armed bank robbery in violation of Titl

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.

540 U.S. 1065 BABBv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-7142. Supreme Court of United States. December 1, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 77 Fed. Appx

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Case below, 719 F.3d 1019.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.