Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Case No. 21-CR-216 (JDB) LEO BRENT BOZELL IV, also known as Zeeker Bozell, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant Leo Bozell IV is charged via indictment with seven offenses related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 20

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Case No. 23-139 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell CHRISTOPHER CARNELL and DAVID WORTH BOWMAN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-00382 (PLF) ) CHRISTOPHER WARNAGIRIS, ) ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 1:21-cr-120-RCL SCOTT KEVIN FAIRLAMB, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Scott Kevin Fairlamb claims the title of "first" in this Court in several respects: the first person to ple

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-203 (JDB) ALEXANDER SHEPPARD, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Alexander Sheppard is charged via indictment with six offenses related to the breach of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Sheppard h

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 21-0687 (RC) : DAVID CHARLES RHINE, : Re Document Nos.: 42, 43, 46, 47

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-140 (JDB) LARRY BROCK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Larry Brock is charged via indictment with six offenses related to the breach of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. See generally Superseding Indictm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-022 (CKK) CHRISTOPHER RAY GRIDER, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 29, 2022) This criminal case is one of several hundred arising from the insurrection at the United

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 21-158 (RC) : KYLE FITZSIMONS, : Re Document No.: 57 :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-453 (JDB) SEAN MCHUGH, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Sean McHugh is charged by indictment with eight felonies and two misdemeanors in connection with his conduct at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. See

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. Action No. 21-0618 (ABJ) ) RILEY JUNE WILLIAMS, ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Vv. Case No. 1:21-cr-91-RCL CRAIG MICHAEL BINGERT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 6, 2021, a violent mob attacked the United States Capitol as Congress attempted to certify the Electoral College vote. Defendants Isaac Sturgeon, Craig Bingert, and Taylor Johnatakis allegedly joined the fray and rammed a line of police officers with a metal barricade. The government charged each defendan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-0454 (PLF) ) ANTHONY PUMA, ) ) Defendant. )

867 F.Supp. 686 (1994) Charles BROM, Plaintiff, v. BOZELL, JACOBS, KENYON & ECKHARDT, INC. and Bozell, Inc., Defendants. No. 89 C 7021. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 25, 1994. *687 *688 *689 Jac A. Cotiguala, Cot

Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. These two cases raise a common question: whether the police may, without a warrant, search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested. I A In the first case, p

669 F.Supp.2d 903 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Brian K. LILLIE. No. 08 CR 717. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 28, 2009. *904 Timothy John Chapman, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT M. DOW, JR.

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Sun-Diamond is a large agricultural cooperative owned by individual member cooperatives including Diamond Walnut Growers, Sun-Maid Growers of California, Sunsweet Growers, Valley Fig Growers, and Hazelnut Growers of Oregon. It came within the sights of an independent counsel, Donald C. Smaltz, who was responsible for investigating allegation

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 11, 1997 Decided March 20, 1998 No. 97-3072 United States of America, Appellee v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, Appellant

964 F.Supp. 486 (1997) UNITED STATES of America v. SUN-DIAMOND GROWERS OF CALIFORNIA. Criminal Action No. 96-193. United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 13, 1997. *487 *488 Donald C. Smaltz, Barry Coburn, Office of Independent Counsel, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff. Ric