Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before STEPHENS, DEERWESTER, and MCCOY Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Alexander BOYD Lance Corporal (E-3

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KING, STEPHENS, and GEIS, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Devin A. BOYD Person

Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge I. BACKGROUND On August 21, 2018, Jeffrey G. Boyd ("Boyd") was indicted on one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which states: (g) It shall be unlawful for any person-

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Andre Deshawn Boyd has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Boyd has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the reco

CCA 20150632. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to February 15, 2017.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Montana Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

Ordek on Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Sever Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge The United States of American brings this criminal action against Defendants Shawndale Tyrone Boyd (“Boyd”) and Damian Sleugh (“Sleugh”) (collectively, “defendants”) charging defendants with: conspiracy to distribute marijuana (Count One), attempting to possess with the intent to distribute marijuana (Count Two); committ

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, J.A. FISCHER, M.K. JAMISON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH C. BOYD LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201300302 GENERAL

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter came before the court this date upon hearing on the government’s appeal of release order (DE 35), filed June 23, 2014. Defendant is charged with multiple drug crimes. Defendant appeared before the Honorable Kimberly A. Swank, United States Magistrate Judge, for hearing June 20, 2014, on the government’s motion for pretrial detention. The magistrate judg

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Eugene Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A c

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reginal Marcellius Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion, denying his Rule 59(e) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or j

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Occasionally the United States Sentencing Commission revises a guideline to reduce the offense level for certain conduct and makes the change retroactive. Those sentenced under the old guideline can then seek reductions in their sentences. At resentencing, the district court recalculates the defendant’s guideline range, replacing the provision used in the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gemini Boyd appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to take judicial notice of his pro se motions as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United Stat

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Lee Boyd, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion construed by the district court as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The orders are not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to file supplemental objections to the pre-sentence investigation report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT J. JONKER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress cocaine base and a firearm found during a search of 1200 Banbury Road, Apartment 9, as well *998as Defendant’s statements made during the search (docket # 13). The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the motion on Apr

640 F.3d 657 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Dewayne BOYD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-6402. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 18, 2011. Decided and Filed: April 7, 2011. *661 ARGUED: Bradley L. Henry, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Zachary Charles B

PER CURIAM: Gemini Boyd appeals the district court's text-order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). Because the district court lacked the authority to consider Boyd's motion for reconsideration, see *303United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.),

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to enforce the plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boyd,

686 F.Supp.2d 382 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, v. Anthony BOYD, Defendant. No. 09 Cr. 347(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 1, 2010. *383 Janis Echenberg, U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY, New York, NY, for United States of America. OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Ju