Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. BLACK 2017 BMW 540”
Artem V. Gelis v. BMW of North America LLCpublic domain
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 24-2721 ARTEM V. GELIS; BHAWAR PATEL; CHRIS WILLIAMS; ASHKOCK PATEL; KENNETH GAGNON ET AL., v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Appellant _____________________________ Appeal from the U.S. District Court, D.N.J. Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor, No. 2:17-cv-07386 Before: KRAUSE, PHIPPS, and ROTH, Circuit Judges
United States v. Steinmanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1703 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cr-00068- v. ART-CLB-1 TRISTON HARRIS STEINMAN, OPINION De
United States v. Vazquez-Rijospublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1305 19-1312 19-1315 20-1603 20-1604 20-1920 20-1951 21-1098 21-1100 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. AUREA VÁZQUEZ RIJOS, a/k/a Beatriz Vázquez, a/k/a Aurea Dominicci; MARCIA VÁZQUEZ RIJOS; and JOSÉ FERRER SOSA, Defendants, Appellants.
United States v. Gamblepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal No. 19-348 (CKK) LAWRENCE GAMBLE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 6, 2020) Pending before the Court is Defendant Lawrence Gamble’s Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Motion to Rev
United States v. Suggspublic domain
William J. Martinez, United States District Judge The Government charges Defendant Perry Wayne Suggs, Jr. ("Suggs"), with being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (ECF No. 24.) Currently before the Court is Suggs's Motion to Suppress, arguing that evidence agains
United States v. Steinmanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1703 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cr-00068- ART-CLB-1 v. TRISTON HARRIS STEINMAN, ORDER AND
Runyon v. United Statespublic domain
*581OPINION REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence (“Motion”), filed by David Anthony Runyon (“Petitioner”) on February 4, 2016. ECF No. 511.1 Further before the court are the Petitioner’s First Motion for Discover
United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In the early 2000s, the United States engaged in a war in Iraq, which persisted for several years. To support the military on the ground, the United States government contracted with civilian companies to provide a wide variety of services. Defendant Kellogg,
New York v. United Parcel Service, Inc.public domain
CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER1 KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ...596 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .. .597 A. Pre-Trial Proceedings ... 597 B. The Trial ... 600 III. FINDINGS OF FACT ... 601 A. Public Health Issues Associated w
Erie Insurance Ex. v. United Services Auto, Aplt.public domain
[J-23-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE A/S/O : No. 19 WAP 2024 BATES COLLISION, INC. JAMES MYERS, : ANITA MORGAN, LOSSIE AUTO : Appeal from the Order of the SERVICE, AND BENEDICTINE SISTERS : Superi
141 Nev., Advance Opinion a ct IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE No. 85525 COMPANY. A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION; UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., D/B/A UNITEDHEALTHCARE, A FILED MINNESOTA CORPORATION; UMR, INC., D/B/A UNITED MEDICAL
League of Women Voters of PA v. Cmwlthpublic domain
[J-1-2018] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF : No. 159 MM 2017 PENNSYLVANIA, CARMEN FEBO SAN : MIGUEL, JAMES SOLOMON, JOHN : On the Recommended Findings of Fact GREINER, JOHN CAPOWSKI, : and Conclusions of Law of the GRETCHEN BRANDT, THOMAS : Co
State v. Patrick M.public domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Copublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 122–180 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Copublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Copublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 122–180 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Copublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
State v. Whitepublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Tears v. Bos. Scientific Corp.public domain
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge This case arises from Plaintiff Terrance Tears' 2002 implantation with the Greenfield Filter, a vena cava filter manufactured by Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation ("BSC"). Tears seeks compensatory and punitive damages from BSC for alleged negligence, strict products liability, breach of express and implied warranties, fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment, negligent misrepresentation, an
Doe v. Parrillopublic domain
2021 IL 126577 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 126577) JANE DOE, Appellant, v. BEAU PARRILLO, Appellee. Opinion filed November 18, 2021. JUSTICE THEIS delivered the judgment of the court,