Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. BANCROFT”
Bancroft Global Dev. v. United Statespublic domain
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Bancroft Global Development, Michael Stock, and Melissa Bates Stock seek the return of documents seized during the execution of a search warrant in 2011, as well as money damages for the allegedly unlawful disclosure of their confidential tax return information. In particular, Plaintiffs allege that employees of several fede
United States v. Sideman & Bancroft, LLPpublic domain
OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Sideman & Bancroft, LLP (Sideman) appeals from the district court’s order enforcing an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) administrative summons. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. I. The IRS is currently undertaking a criminal investigation of
Bancroft v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Bancroft v. United Statespublic domain
540 U.S. 1083 BANCROFTv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-7295. Supreme Court of United States. December 8, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 3d Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 68 Fed. A
Bancroft v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Martinelli v. Bancroft Chophouse, LLCpublic domain
D. Subsequent Conduct Plaintiff alleges that he was thereafter subjected to "an overall uncomfortable feeling" when he would walk into the restaurant and felt as though he was being ostracized by The Bancroft management. The only specific incident that Martinelli can recall, however, involved his request of another manager to help him find a particular wine. The Manager acted annoyed and told him that it was located in the
Bancroft v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Bancroft v. Mainepublic domain
541 U.S. 978 BANCROFTv.MAINE. No. 03-8930. Supreme Court of United States. April 5, 2004. 1 Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.
Bancroft v. Mainepublic domain
Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Cer-tiorari denied.
Bancroft v. Mainepublic domain
Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States v. Bancroftpublic domain
Opinion of the Court GEORGE W. Latimer, Judge: This case is before us on certificate from The Judge Advocate General, United States Navy, requesting that we determine whether the special court-martial which convicted the accused had jurisdiction to hear the cause. The question becomes important for the reasons hereinafter set forth. The accused was tried by special court-martial at Ichon-n
Bancroft v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Grant Bancroft Heinepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Grant Heine was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (1988) and possession of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) (1988). He was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 19 months for possessing a firearm and 6 months for possessing cocaine and was ordered to serve three years of supervised release. On appe
In Re Bancroftpublic domain
204 B.R. 548 (1997) In re Kenneth M. BANCROFT, Debtor. In re Walter R. DODDS and Debra M. Dodds, Debtors. In re Wendy L. RODGERS, Debtor. In re Cheryl A. STRUVE, Debtor. In re Adeline SMITH, Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 96-82458, 96-82531, 96-82685, 96-82740 and 96-82810. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois. January 16, 1997.
Bancroft v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Bancroftpublic domain
Per curiam: Affirmed upon the authority of Glavey v. 595; States v. Andrews, 240 U. S. 90; McMath v. United States, 248 U. S. 151, 152.
United States v. Bancroftpublic domain
Per Curiam. Affirmed upon the authority of Glavey v. United States, 182 U. S. 595; United States v. Andrews, 240 U. S. 90, 94; McMath v. United States, 248 U. S. 151, 152, Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Seymour, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for the United States.
United States v. Giraudopublic domain
CLARIFYING ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE While investigating Defendants, federal agents decided to bug a courthouse. They also decided that they didn’t need a warrant to, yes, bug a courthouse. There can be no doubt that these decisions flouted constitutional and statutory protections alike. But in this criminal case, questions remain about who may suppress what as a result.
Bancroft Global Development v. Koskinenpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 17-395 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 42
Bancroft v. Jamesonpublic domain
19 A.3d 730 (2010) In re the Matter of Blake Sebastian BANCROFT v. Tabitha JAMESON. Raymond Nickelson In the Interest of Breanna M. Nickelson DOB: [Redacted]. No. CS09-03603. Family Court of Delaware, Sussex County. Submitted: December 23, 2009. Decided: July 15, 2010. Stephen Welsh, Esquire, Law Office of Edward C. Gill, P.A., Georgetown, D