⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. BANCROFT”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 2× · 330 F. Supp. 3d 82
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Bancroft Global Development, Michael Stock, and Melissa Bates Stock seek the return of documents seized during the execution of a search warrant in 2011, as well as money damages for the allegedly unlawful disclosure of their confidential tax return information. In particular, Plaintiffs allege that employees of several fede
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-01-08 · Published · cited 5× · 704 F.3d 1197; 2013 WL 71777; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 468; 111 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 460
OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Sideman & Bancroft, LLP (Sideman) appeals from the district court’s order enforcing an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) administrative summons. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. I. The IRS is currently undertaking a criminal investigation of
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-12-08 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1083
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-12-08 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1083; 124 S. Ct. 946
540 U.S. 1083 BANCROFTv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-7295. Supreme Court of United States. December 8, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 3d Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 68 Fed. A
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-12-08 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1083
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-02-22 · Published · cited 1× · 357 F. Supp. 3d 95
D. Subsequent Conduct Plaintiff alleges that he was thereafter subjected to "an overall uncomfortable feeling" when he would walk into the restaurant and felt as though he was being ostracized by The Bancroft management. The only specific incident that Martinelli can recall, however, involved his request of another manager to help him find a particular wine. The Manager acted annoyed and told him that it was located in the
Bancroft v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 945; 121 S. Ct. 1410
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Bancroft v. Mainepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 541 U.S. 978; 124 S. Ct. 1889
541 U.S. 978 BANCROFTv.MAINE. No. 03-8930. Supreme Court of United States. April 5, 2004. 1 Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.
Bancroft v. Mainepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 541 U.S. 978
Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Cer-tiorari denied.
Bancroft v. Mainepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 541 U.S. 978
Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States Court of Military Appeals · 1953-07-03 · Published · cited 1× · 3 C.M.A. 3; 3 USCMA 3; 11 C.M.R. 3; 1953 CMA LEXIS 786; 1953 WL 1961
Opinion of the Court GEORGE W. Latimer, Judge: This case is before us on certificate from The Judge Advocate General, United States Navy, requesting that we determine whether the special court-martial which convicted the accused had jurisdiction to hear the cause. The question becomes important for the reasons hereinafter set forth. The accused was tried by special court-martial at Ichon-n
Bancroft v. Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 532 U.S. 945
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990-12-07 · Published · cited 21× · 920 F.2d 552; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21116; 1990 WL 192958
PER CURIAM. Grant Heine was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (1988) and possession of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) (1988). He was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 19 months for possessing a firearm and 6 months for possessing cocaine and was ordered to serve three years of supervised release. On appe
In Re Bancroftpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997-01-16 · Published · cited 8× · 204 B.R. 548; 37 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 506; 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 39; 1997 WL 22520
204 B.R. 548 (1997) In re Kenneth M. BANCROFT, Debtor. In re Walter R. DODDS and Debra M. Dodds, Debtors. In re Wendy L. RODGERS, Debtor. In re Cheryl A. STRUVE, Debtor. In re Adeline SMITH, Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 96-82458, 96-82531, 96-82685, 96-82740 and 96-82810. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois. January 16, 1997.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1980-12-08 · Published · cited 5× · 449 U.S. 1038; 101 S. Ct. 618; 66 L. Ed. 2d 501; 49 U.S.L.W. 3428; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 4321
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1922-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 58 Ct. Cl. 703; 56 Ct. Cl. 218
Per curiam: Affirmed upon the authority of Glavey v. 595; States v. Andrews, 240 U. S. 90; McMath v. United States, 248 U. S. 151, 152.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1922-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 260 U.S. 706; 58 Ct. Cl. 703; 56 Ct. Cl. 218; 43 S. Ct. 165; 67 L. Ed. 473; 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2416
Per Curiam. Affirmed upon the authority of Glavey v. United States, 182 U. S. 595; United States v. Andrews, 240 U. S. 90, 94; McMath v. United States, 248 U. S. 151, 152, Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Seymour, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for the United States.
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 225 F. Supp. 3d 1078; 2016 WL 7386132; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176813
CLARIFYING ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE While investigating Defendants, federal agents decided to bug a courthouse. They also decided that they didn’t need a warrant to, yes, bug a courthouse. There can be no doubt that these decisions flouted constitutional and statutory protections alike. But in this criminal case, questions remain about who may suppress what as a result.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 17-395 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 42
Bancroft v. Jamesonpublic domain
Delaware Family Court · 2010-07-15 · Published · cited 2× · 19 A.3d 730; 2010 Del. Fam. Ct. LEXIS 75; 2010 WL 6595337
19 A.3d 730 (2010) In re the Matter of Blake Sebastian BANCROFT v. Tabitha JAMESON. Raymond Nickelson In the Interest of Breanna M. Nickelson DOB: [Redacted]. No. CS09-03603. Family Court of Delaware, Sussex County. Submitted: December 23, 2009. Decided: July 15, 2010. Stephen Welsh, Esquire, Law Office of Edward C. Gill, P.A., Georgetown, D