⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Ayon-Ramos”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 970
*970C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 976; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 977; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 693; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 931; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 472; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 351;
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 970
*970C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 976; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 977; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 693; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 931; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 472; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 351;
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4078 Doc: 105 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4075 Doc: 105 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4100 Doc: 102 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4077 Doc: 105 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4107 Doc: 103 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 10× · 98 F.4th 90
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4072 Doc: 108 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026-04-15 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3532 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00202- TWR-1 v. HIGINIO ALEJANDRO OPINION GONZALEZ-REYES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States D
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-12-10 · Published · cited 69× · 550 F.3d 952; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25451; 2008 WL 5158599
550 F.3d 952 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeremiah WEST, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-4284. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 10, 2008. *954 Submitted on the briefs:[*] James A. Valdez of James A. Valdez, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant Jeremiah We
District Court, S.D. California · 2011-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 762 F. Supp. 2d 1209; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2136; 2011 WL 90226
762 F.Supp.2d 1209 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Bernardo DELEON-TORRES, Defendant. Case No. 10cr3751 BTM. United States District Court, S.D. California. January 10, 2011. *1210 Randy K. Jones, Mark R. Rehe, U.S. Attorneys Office Southern District of California, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff. Candis L. Mitc
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 DNH 070
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Francisco J. Reyes Caparrós v. Civil No. 15-cv-2229-JNL Opinion No. 2019 DNH 070 William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States MEMORANDUM ORDER In this employment action against a federal-government employer, the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial turns on whether
Arizona Supreme Court · 2014-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA THE WEITZ COMPANY L.L.C., AN IOWA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. NICHOLAS HETH, A SINGLE MAN; BARRY SCHWARTZ, A MARRIED MAN; JEFFREY TEMPLIN, A MARRIED MAN; KEN PERLMUTTER, A MARRIED MAN; SHELLY MALKIN, A MARRIED WOMAN; JODY STORM GALE AND CHRISTIE BAUER GALE, HUSBAND AND WIFE; JEFF TEMPLIN AND TERRI TEMPLIN, HUSBAND AND WIF
Arizona Supreme Court · 2014-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA THE WEITZ COMPANY L.L.C., AN IOWA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. NICHOLAS HETH, A SINGLE MAN; BARRY SCHWARTZ, A MARRIED MAN; JEFFREY TEMPLIN, A MARRIED MAN; KEN PERLMUTTER, A MARRIED MAN; SHELLY MALKIN, A MARRIED WOMAN; JODY STORM GALE AND CHRISTIE BAUER GALE, HUSBAND AND WIFE; JEFF TEMPLIN AND TERRI TEMPLIN, HUSBAND AND WIF
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021-04-01 · Published · cited 93× · 992 F.3d 1193
USCA11 Case: 16-16492 Date Filed: 04/01/2021 Page: 1 of 35 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16492 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cv-01732-VMC-TBM NORIS BABB,
California Court of Appeal · 2013-10-01 · Published · cited 59× · 220 Cal. App. 4th 67; 162 Cal. Rptr. 3d 739; 2013 WL 5435085; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 784
Opinion ELIA, J. Pursuant to a plea bargain, Mathew James Jacobs pleaded no contest to forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)) 1 and admitted a sentence enhancement allegation pursuant to section 12022.8 in case No. CR-11-01306 and pleaded no contest to unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor mo
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011-01-21 · Published · cited 1× · 794 F. Supp. 2d 1119
794 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2011) G., Parent and Next Friend of K., A Disabled Child, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of HAWAII, Department of Human Services, et al., Defendants. G., Parent and Next Friend of K., A Disabled Child, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants. Civ. Nos. 08-00551 ACK-BMK, 09-00044 ACK-BMK. United States District Court,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-03-15 · Published · cited 626× · 243 F.3d 510; 2001 WL 253195
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge: Anant Ram, his wife, Nazra Bibi Ram, and their daughter, Sangeeta Ram (collectively, “Petitioners”) petition for review of their final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) *512 on June 29,1999. Petitioners contend that they were eli
Weitz Co. v. Hethpublic domain
Arizona Supreme Court · 2014-08-26 · Published · cited 3× · 235 Ariz. 405; 333 P.3d 23; 2014 Ariz. LEXIS 148
Justice TIMMER, opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes § 33-992(A) gives mechanics’ liens priority over liens recorded after construction begins on real property. We are asked to decide whether that statute precludes assignment by equitable subrogation of a lien that attached before construction began on the project at issue. We hold that it does not. Additionally, although a third party generall
Weitz Co. v. Hethpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013-11-26 · Published · cited 0× · 233 Ariz. 442; 314 P.3d 569; 674 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 29; 2013 WL 6188406; 2013 Ariz. App. LEXIS 241
OPINION BROWN, Judge. ¶ 1 The question we address is whether Arizona’s statutory provision governing the priority of mechanics’ liens (Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 33-992(A)) permits a court to shift lien priorities by applying the doctrine of equitable subrogation. Because § 33-992(A) expressly provides that mechanics’ liens have priority over all subsequent encumbrances (subject t