Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Ayala-Vargas”
Vargas-Ayala v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Jose Manuel Vargas-Ayala and his wife Maria Guadalupe Vargas, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal and denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence credibility findings, S
Appellants Vargas-Martinez and Arroyo-Ayala seek to reverse convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Arroyo-Ayala also appeals from a conviction of conspiracy to import a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963.
King v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
991 F.2d 1452 125 A.L.R.Fed. 675 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hector Manuel BRUMEL-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Efren MENDEZ-DUENAS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mario VARGAS-BRUUN, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jorge CARRANZA-PENICHE, Def
976 F.2d 1235 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hector Manuel BRUMEL-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Efren MENDEZ-DUENAS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mario VARGAS-BRUUN, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jorge CARRANZA-PENICHE, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, P
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Blanco v. United Statespublic domain
DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
United States v. Oregon-Cortezpublic domain
244 F.Supp.2d 1167 (2003) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff v. Mario OREGON-CORTEZ, Rey Baltazar Aleman-Morales, Walter Saldana, Francisco Javier Garcia, Salvador Torres, Elena Cortez-Sotelo, Donald Ray Martin, Vaughn T. Rael, Ryan Patrick Donohue, Christopher Cornelius Allen, James Dean Santucci, Miguel Rodriguez, Francisco Javier Cortez-Vargas, Jesus Oregon-Cortez, Ascencion Oregon-Cortez, Juan Manuel Oregon, Ignacio CEJA Hernandez, Arturo Gar
United States v. Rudolphpublic domain
Case: 21-30739 Document: 164-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-30739 M
Lopez-Ruiz v. United Statespublic domain
*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848
United States v. Cervantespublic domain
Case: 23-20133 Document: 87-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
United States v. Fitzpatrickpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1367 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DEREK FITZPATRICK, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge] Befo
United States v. Guia-Sendemepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1162 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. DIONEL GUÍA-SENDEME, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Raúl M. Arias-Marxuach, U.S. District Judge] Before
United States v. Gonzalez-Riverapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1418 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ LUIS GONZÁLEZ-RIVERA, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Raúl M. Arias-Marxuach, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. D'Angelopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1875 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MICHEL D'ANGELO, a/k/a Karma, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Nancy Torresen, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Campos-Ayalapublic domain
Case: 21-50642 Document: 189-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-50642 June 7, 2024
United States v. Quiles-Lopezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1379, 19-1380 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MIGUEL QUILES-LOPEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Concepcionpublic domain
825 F.Supp. 19 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Ana MORILLO, a/k/a Rossi Colon, a/k/a Marta Fernandez, a/k/a Luz Lopez, a/k/a Gloria Velez, a/k/a Jeanette Ruiz, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Jane ARENDELL, a/k/a Maria Gonzalez, a/k/a Annette Rive
United States v. Colon-De Jesuspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1528 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ COLÓN-DE JESÚS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge] B