Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert Daniel Argueta-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ar-gueta-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Defendant Ulises Argueta-Mejia is charged in a one-count Indictment with unlawful re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and is subject to an enhanced penalty pursuant to § 1326(b)(2) because his prior deportation was subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony offense. (ECF No. 1.) On December 19

PER CURIAM: * Lucas Orlando Argueta-Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The Government’s motion to supplement the record on appeal is GRANTED. Argueta-Ramirez’s motion to strike the Government’s brief, in whole or in part, is DENIED. Argueta-Ramirez argues first that the district court plainly erred when i

MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Argueta contends that the district court erred in denying the *974motion to suppress evidence gained pursuant to the search warrant on the basis that the evidence the government used to connect him to the drug scheme was based only upon a confidential informant’s unverified and uncorroborated statements contained in the affid

MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Argueta-Malagon appeals from his guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Argueta-Malagon concedes that Ninth Circuit precedent forecloses his argument that imposition of a sentence longer than 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)’s two-year statutory maximum based on a prior conviction neither alleged in the indictment nor admitted during the pl

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reynaldo Antonio Ulloa-Ar-gueta has moved for leave to withdraw and *230has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ulloa-Argueta ha

PER CURIAM: * Jose Isaac Velasquez-Argueta appeals his within-guideline sentence for his guilty-plea conviction of illegally reentering the United States after deportation. He argues that the district court erred in concluding that his Maryland conviction for robbery with a dangerous weapon qualified as a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) (2014). The Government moves for summa

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-1581 ______________ JORGE ARGUETA-ORELLANA Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ______________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (A2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

822 F.2d 62 U.S.v.Argueta-Rodriguez 86-5277 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 6/26/87 1 S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED

*1162BYBEE, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment and dissenting as to everything else: I agree with the majority that the specific-intent standard that governs Argue-ta-Rosales’s case is supplied by United States v. Lombera-Valdovinos, 429 F.3d 927, 928-30 (9th Cir.2005). Because'the district court failed

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-10224 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-04-00094-HDM/ RAM ANIBAL JOSE DIAZ-ARGUETA, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND  OPINION Appeal from the United

564 F.3d 1047 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anibal Jose DIAZ-ARGUETA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-10224. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 13, 2006. Filed April 24, 2009. *1048 Cynthia S. Hahn, Reno, NV, for the defendant-appellant. R. Don

The Supreme Court's decision in Simmons does more to call into question the Seventh Circuit's treatment of the FTCA's exceptions as non-jurisdictional. In that case, the district court dismissed plaintiff's FTCA claim based upon the FTCA's discretionary function exception. Simmons , 136 S.Ct. at 1846. The plaintiff then brough

PRADO, Circuit Judge: Jose Isaías Medina-Argueta pleaded guilty to harboring illegal aliens and conspiring to harbor illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 and 18 U.S.C. § 2, but reserved the right to contest the district *481 court’s “vulnerable victim” enhancement under the United States S

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-10224 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-04-00094-HDM/ ANIBAL JOSE DIAZ-ARGUETA, RAM Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada

MEMORANDUM ** Fernando Alberto Mendez-Argueta appeals from his conviction and sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a)(1)(B) for willful failure or refusal to make a timely application in good faith for travel documents necessary to effectuate an order of deportation. There was sufficient evidence of alienage to justify the denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal, but the District Court did commit reversible