Cases

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Defendant Noel Aquino-Florenciani pleaded guilty to both producing and possessing child pornography and was sentenced to 264 months' imprisonment to be followed by ten years of supervised release. On appeal, Aquino-Florenciani seeks resentencing, raising three claims of error. We affirm. I. In Octob

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elias Aquino-Miranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Aquino-Miranda has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Isabaz Aquino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Aquino has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record ref

674 F.3d 918 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Luis Alberto AQUINO, Appellee. No. 11-1372. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 15, 2011. Filed: March 22, 2012. *919 Nancy A. Svoboda, AUSA, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant. Shannon Patrick O'Connor, First Assista

555 F.3d 124 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Michael Ray AQUINO, Appellant. No. 07-3202. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued: November 21, 2008. Opinion Filed: February 6, 2009. *125 Mark A. Berman, Esq., (Argued), Hartmann, Doherty, Rosa & Berman, Hackensack, NJ, for Appellant. St

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alvaro Aquino-Martinez (Aquino) has moved for leave to withdraw *936and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Aquino has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s

Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-6-2009 USA v. Aquino Precedential or Non-Precedential:

PER CURIAM. Defendant Miguel Aquino-Garcia appeals from his conviction for possession of stolen United States mail. See 18 U.S.C. § 1708. In August 2001, Aquino-Garcia and his wife entered a branch of the Banco Bilbao Vizcaya in Los Colobos, Carolina, Puerto Rico, to obtain two bank checks to be used to purchase a house. To secure these che

207 F.Supp.2d 54 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Thomas AQUINO, Defendant. No. 99-CR-6010L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. February 20, 2002. *55 Lawrence L. Kasperek, Rochester, NY, Robert G. Smith, Federal Public Defender, Rochester, NY, Barry D. Leiwant, The Legal Aid Society, Federal Defender Divi

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED. The defendant Thomas Aquino appeals from a judgment entered on March 12, 2002, in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Chief Judge), convicting him of possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of §§ 92

MEMORANDUM ** Robert Aquino appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court erred by basing the sentence on a quantity of drugs greater than specified in the indictment or plea. We reject his argument and we affirm. DISCUSSION Aquino contends that the district court erred by calculating his sentence using quantities of methamphetamine not charged in the indictm

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant’s conviction on Count II for possession of ammunition by a convicted felon is hereby VACATED AND DISMISSED and the judgment of the District Court is REMANDED to the district court. Aquino appeals from the February 14, 2000, judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, J.

SEFTON, Senior Judge: We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 the Government’s response, and appellant’s final rejoinder. We also heard the excellent expositions of the positions of both appellant and the Government in oral argument. Based on our careful consideration of the record and each of the matters addressed above, we conclude that the findings and sentence are cor

PER CURIAM. In this sentencing appeal, defendant Francisco Aquino-De La Rosa challenges his sentence on the sole ground that resentencing is required by United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The government has moved for summary affirmance on the grounds that defendant waived his right to appeal in his plea agreement and that,

109 F.3d 936 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Miguel AQUINO-CHACON, a/k/a Miguel Chacon-Aquino, a/k/aMiguel Chacon-Jackson, a/k/a Miguel Angel Chacon-Fuentes,a/k/a Michael Chacon-Fuentes, a/k/a Miguel Chacone, a/k/aMiguel Chacon, a/k/a Michael Chacon, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-5980. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge RUSSELL and Judge HERLONG joined. OPINION WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Miguel Aquino-Chacon entered a conditional guilty plea to illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1326(a) (West Supp.1996). He now appeals, contending that his prosecution violated the Due Process Clau

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0270p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plain

905 F.Supp. 351 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Miguel AQUINO-CHACON, Defendant. No. CR 95-0426-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. December 4, 1995. *352 Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Michael E. O'Hare, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for U.S. J

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2111 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Veronica Del Carmen Pineda De Aquino

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.