Cases

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I would deny leave to appeal and uphold the judgment of *142the Court of Appeals. I would also call on the Legislature to promptly clarify its intentions concerning the need for the certification of foreign affidavits used in Michigan judicial proceedings. Although the range of support from amici curiae fo

JANSEN, J. Plaintiffs, Sue H. Apsey and Robert Apsey, Jr., appeal as of right a circuit court order granting summary disposition for defendants, Memorial Hospital, doing business in Owosso as Memorial Healthcare Center; two of its practitioners, doctors Russell H. Tobe and James H. Deering; and the business entities under which they practice. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Plaintiffs com

MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ronald Smith (“Plaintiff’ or “Smith”) was working as a driver for a federal government agency on November 5, 2009, when he dropped off passengers near a controlled barricade on the outskirts of the United States Capitol complex. Smith encountered Defendant Corey

221 U.S. 514 (1911) APSEY, RECEIVER OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHELSEA, v. KIMBALL. SAME v. WHITTEMORE. Nos. 132, 133. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 20, 1911. Decided May 29, 1911. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. Mr. George L. Wil

McCORD, Circuit Judge. On July 8, 1938, the United States of America filed its petition to condemn several tracts of land in Putnam County, Georgia, for use in connection with a project of the Department of Agriculture. This appeal involves three parcels of land containing 224.09 acres and designated as Tract No. 73 in the condemnation petition. Among those named as defendants to the condemnation proceeding were Cor

95 F.2d 986 (1938) COGGESHALL v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 4268. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. April 5, 1938. *987 Henry E. Davis, of Florence, S. C., for appellant. Lawrence S. Apsey, Sp. Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., and J. Ivey Humphrey, Asst. Atty. Gen., of South Carolina (Claud N. Sapp

65 F.Supp. 271 (1946) UNITED STATES v. HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO. et al. Civil Action No. 4426. District Court, N. D. Ohio, W. D. April 3, 1946. *272 Wendell Berge, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lawrence S. Apsey, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for plaintiff. Marshall, Melhorn, Wall & Bloch and Stuart S. Wall, all of Toledo, Ohio, and Cahi

323 U.S. 386 (1945) HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. No. 2. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 15, 16, 17, 18, 1943. Reargued October 9, 10, 1944. Decided January 8, 1945. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.[*]*390

PER CURIAM. Eor the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Court, Brewster, J., 4 F. Supp. 33, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

4 F.Supp. 33 (1933) CHANNING v. UNITED STATES. No. 5447. District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 10, 1933. Channing, Corneau & Frothingham and Lawrence S. Apsey, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. Frederick H. Tarr, U. S. Atty., and J. Duke Smith, Sp. Asst. to U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass. BREWSTER, District Judge. To this petition to

CONGER, District Judge. Motion by the plaintiff for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite to take possession of, manage and control all of the property and assets of the defendant Auditorium Conditioning Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Auditorium). The action has been brought by the government to obtain a decree dissolving the defendant Auditorium on the ground that it operated an illegal pa

46 F.Supp. 541 (1942) UNITED STATES v. HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO. et al. No. 4426. District Court, N. D. Ohio, W. D. August 25, 1942. *542 *543 *544 Thurman Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel S. Isseks and Lawrence S. Apsey, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and Victor

KLOEB, District Judge (Orally). Let us take up these motions in order. First, there is the motion filed by Corning Glass Works and the Empire Machine Company et al., in connection with the supplemental answer of these defendants, leave for the filing of the supplemental answer having been granted at the session here last Tuesday, October 15. The supplemental answer is accompanied by what is termed a “consent decree,” to whic

148 F.2d 416 (1945) UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. No. 144. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 12, 1945. *417 *418 *419 *420 *421 Charles Fahy, Sol. Gen.

59 F.Supp. 665 (1945) UNITED STATES v. WILLIAM S. GRAY & CO. et al. District Court, S. D. New York. January 13, 1945. *666 Irving B. Glickfeld, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., by Wendell Berge, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lawrence S. Apsey, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for plaintiff. Lowe, Dougherty, Hart & Marcus, of New York City (J. H. Dougherty

113 F.2d 194 (1940) UNITED STATES v. STANOLIND CRUDE OIL PURCHASING CO. SAME v. GULF OIL CORPORATION. SAME v. SINCLAIR PRAIRIE OIL CO. Nos. 1975-1977. Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 29, 1940. *195 A. F. Moss, of Tulsa, Okl., and F. W. Files, of Pawhuska, Okl. (Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty.

99 F.2d 830 (1938) UNITED STATES v. KENNESAW MOUNTAIN BATTLEFIELD ASS'N. KENNESAW MOUNTAIN BATTLEFIELD ASS'N v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 8822, 8896. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 14, 1938. *831 Lawrence S. Apsey, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., J. W. Cooper, Sp. Atty., Department of

98 F.2d 609 (1938) WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 4311. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. August 26, 1938. R. E. Whitehurst, of New Bern, N. C. (M. S. Dunn, of New Bern, N. C., on the brief), for appellants. Charles R. Denny, Jr., Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., and Charles F. Rouse, Asst. U. S. Atty., o

310 U.S. 16 (1940) UNITED STATES v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. No. 587. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 28, 1940. Decided April 22, 1940. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *17 Assistant Attorney General Littell, with whom Solicitor General Biddle,

SANBORN, Circuit Judge. These appeals are from judgments awarding compensation to appellees in condemnation proceedings brought by the United States to acquire the right to flood— above Government Dam No. 5 in the Mississippi River — the right-of-way and embankment of the appellee Railroad Company upon which its tracks and the telegraph line of the appellee Western Union Telegraph and Cable Company are located. These judgmen