Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Antonio Hernandez”
FAY, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted appellants Yolanda Bau-ta, Hector Giral and Antonio Hernandez for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of more than 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute. Appellant Bauta challenges her conviction, alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support the charges against her and that the unprofessio
United States v. Hernandez-Antoniopublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Narciso Hernandez-Antonio has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez-Antonio received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal
United States v. Antonio Hernandez-Gonzalezpublic domain
*1242TRASK, Circuit Judge: Antonio Hernandez-Gonzalez appeals his conviction of a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2), transporting aliens illegally within the United States. We affirm. Appellant was apprehended on December 29, 1976, by Agents Hemley and Gilford of the United States Border Patrol. On t
United States v. Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Adela Deann Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the r
Holguin-Hernandez v. United Statespublic domain
Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. *764 A criminal defendant who wishes a court of appeals to consider a claim that a ruling of a trial court was in error must first make his objection known to the trial-court judge. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide two ways
United States v. Hernandez-Martinezpublic domain
BERZON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals were brought by defendants seeking to reduce their sentences for drug-related crimes. They invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to reduce in certain circumstances a previously imposed sentence, and contend that the Supreme Court's recent interpretat
United States v. Maria Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Maria Hernandez and Hilda Mendoza, two former employees at El Paso Federal Credit Union, pleaded guilty to wire and bank fraud charges arising out of their modified “Ponzi scheme,” in the course of which they issued “unrecorded” share certificates and misappropriated the proceeds. In this consolidated appeal, both defendants challenge the sentences im
United States v. Martinez-Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Antonio Martinez-Hernandez-has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Hernandez has hot filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s b
United States v. Hernandez-Portillopublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Sai-my Donael Hernandez-Portillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Portil-lo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the
United States v. Perez-Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Celso Perez-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant port
United States v. Perez-Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Celso Perez-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant port
United States v. Diaz-Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alberto Diaz-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Diaz-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and th
Maria Hernandez v. United Statespublic domain
HAYNES, Circuit Judge: Maria Hernandez was convicted of and imprisoned for various federal crimes, only to have her conviction set aside ten years later for ineffective assistance of counsel. Federal law permits certain classes of the "unjustly convicted" to sue in the United States Court of Federal Claims for compensation. See
United States v. Martinez-Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Antonio Martinez-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
United States v. Hernandez-Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Hernandez-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
United States v. Felipe Vinagre-Hernandezpublic domain
KURT D. ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judge: Felipe Vinagre-Hernandez appeals his guilty verdict and sentence for aiding and abetting the possession of marijuana in the amount of more than 100 kilograms but less than 1,000 kilograms, with intent to distribute. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the application of the Speedy Trial Act. I.
Hernandez v. United Statespublic domain
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC BY THE COURT: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a b
United States v. Lujan-Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Fabian Lujan-Hernandez has moved for leave *173to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lujan-Hernandez has not filed a response
United States v. Blanca Vasquez-Hernandezpublic domain
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: In unrelated incidents between October 21, 2017 and October 23, 2017, Appellants Blanca Nieve Vasquez-Hernandez, Elba Luz Dominguez-Portillo, Maynor Alonso Claudino-Lopez, Jose Francis Yanes-Mancia, and Natividad Zavala-Zavala were each apprehended by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) soon after entering the United States from Mexico. Appellants,
United States v. Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record re