Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, STEWART, and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nicholas J. ANDRADE Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Andrade-Sierra has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Andrade-Sierra has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

MEMORANDUM ** Sandra Andrade appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 12-month, 1-day sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to structure financial transactions, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Andrade’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Andrade-Figueroa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Andrade-Figuer-oa has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant port

ORDER (Def.’s Motion for Acquittal or New Trial — Dkt. #280; Def.’s Motion for Acquittal' — Dkt. # 283) ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge. I. SUMMARY Before the Court is Defendant Julian Gaytan’s (“Defendant Gaytan”) Renewed Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or, in the Alternative, Motion for New Trial. (Dkt. # 280.) Defendant Joseph Andrade joined in the motion. (Dk

PER CURIAM: * Juan Andrade-Pizarro appeals the 32-month below-guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following prior deportation. Andrade-Pizarro argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court did not appropriately balance the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors to give proper weight to his li

PER CURIAM: * ' The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Andrade has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). An-drade has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Andrade’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’

ORDER Nicolas Andrade-Alcocer pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphet-amines. 21 U.S.C. §§ 846,841(a)(1). In his plea agreement, he waived “his right to appeal his conviction and any sentence imposed on any ground, including the right to appeal conferred by 18 U.S.C. § 3724.” At sentencing the district court calculated a guidelines range of 262 to 327 months’ imprisonment — based on a total offense level of 29 and a crim

551 F.3d 103 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Clarence ANDRADE, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1175. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 3, 2008. Decided December 31, 2008. *105 Mark T. Quinlivan, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Michael J.

PER CURIAM: * ' The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Andrade has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). An-drade has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Andrade’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’

MEMORANDUM ** Ruben Andrade-Casales appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Andrade-Casales’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. A pro

570 F.3d 213 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier ANDRADE-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-41132. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 27, 2009. *214 Michelle Denise Allen-McCoy (argued), McAllen, TX, Jeffery Alan Babcock, James *215 Lee Turner, Asst

502 F.Supp.2d 173 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Clarence ANDRADE. Criminal No. 06-10213-RWZ. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 18, 2007. Charles P. McGinty, Federal Defender's Office, Boston, MA, for Defendant. Mary Elizabeth Carmody, U.S. Attoneys Office, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. ORDER ON PRETRIAL MOTION <

PER CURIAM: * Jose Antonio Andrade was convicted of being unlawfully present in the United States following a prior deportation. He was sentenced to 63 months of imprisonment and a three-year term of supervised release. The Government seeks enforcement of the waiver provisions in Andrade’s plea agreement. We need not decide the applicability of the waiver provisions in this case because the issue

MEMORANDUM ** Edith Andrade appeals from her 15-month sentence imposed following her guilty plea to importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Andrade was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been

531 F.3d 721 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lorena ANDRADE-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Norma Gonzalez-Hernandez, Appellant. Nos. 07-2395, 07-2439. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 12, 2008. Filed: June 26, 2008. *722 Mi

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Juan Andrade-Arroyo appeals from his 77-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Andrade-Arroyo contends that his sentence was unreasonable because the district court faded to give meaningful consideration to the

MEMORANDUM** Jaime Jimmy Andrade appeals his 63-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent *250to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Andrade contends that the district court erred by denying his request for a downward departure based on age, family ties, emp

MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Misael Andrade-Ortiz (An-drade) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Andrade received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue