Cases

BERZON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals were brought by defendants seeking to reduce their sentences for drug-related crimes. They invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to reduce in certain circumstances a previously imposed sentence, and contend that the Supreme Court's recent interpretat

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30309 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:98-cr-00572- MO-8 JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, AKA Efigenio Aispuro-Aispuro, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30310

HOFFMAN, District Judge. The claimant in these cases asks a confirmation of his titles, alleged to be derived from two grants made to him by Governor Micheltorena in 1843. The first is for four square leagues of land situated in San Francisco county. The second is for the islands of Los Faral-lones, Alcatraz and Yerba Buena, and for one square league of land, a little more or less, at Point Tiburón, in the strait of the island o

HOFFMAN, District Judge. The claim in this case having been confirmed by this court [Case No. 14,712], the case was appealed to the supreme court, by whom the decree was reversed, and the cause remanded for further proofs. [20 How. (61 U. S.) 59.] The principal grounds assigned by the supreme court for their decision, are; The want of all record testimony, or any explanation of its absence. The unsatisfactory

MEMORANDUM ** *728Fernando Bocanegra Moreno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial ev

ORDER The opinion filed on July 12, 2016, and reported at 828 F.3d 1052 is hereby amended. The superseding amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. The Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained. OPINION B

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MACARIO JESUS BONILLA, No. 12-73853 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A090-170-253 LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney ORDER AND General, AMENDED Resp

Filed 12/11/14 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, H037353 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 211268) v. GENE SANCHEZ et al., Defendants and Appellants. This appeal follows a mont

Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 420 (BIA 2018) Interim Decision #3934 Matter of J. M. ACOSTA, Respondent Decided August 29, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) A conviction does not attain a sufficient degree of finality for immigration purposes until the right to direct appell

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV