Cases

966 F.2d 1460 U.S.v.Albarado NO. 90-7706 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. June 16, 1992 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ala. 2 REVERSED IN PART, VACATED IN PART. </

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

""1$, woz_~ o z RECE\VED \N COURT OF CR\N\\NAL APPEALS Dec:7,2015 4 l RE: 15,959-B (3719-5) wR-78,6oz_02 . []EC 10 2015 To: Mr. Abel Acosta Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals l - Abe\ ACOSia, C\e|'k P.o. Box 12308, capitol station Austin, Texas 78711 _ c » .Dear Mr. Acosta, This is to inform the Court that the herewith included papers have been filed with the Clerk of the convicting court in the above indicated matter. This is a true and correct copy of what was mailed to the Clerk. Thank

NUMBER 13-18-00629-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE JUAN M. ALBARADO On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Memora

OAKES, Circuit Judge: This case is an addition to the growing body of case law 1 developing around “airport searches,” now a part of everyday air travel, resulting from the threat to the traveling public and to the airlines from hijacking. Here, in the course of a “pat-down

Robert E. Landry, Patrick D. Gallaugher, Jr., Kevin Paul Fontenot, Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry, 901 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 900, Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, (337) 433-9436, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: CITGO Petroleum Corporation Craig Isenberg, Kyle W. Siegal, Joshua O. Cox, Barrasso, Usdin, Kupperman, Freeman & Sarver, L.L.C., 909 Poydras, 24th floor, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, (504) 589-970

496 F.Supp.2d 795 (2007) Robby ALBARADO, et al. Plaintiffs v. KENTUCKY RACING COMMISSION, et al. Defendants and Jerry Bailey, et al. Plaintiffs v. Kentucky Racing Commission, et al. Defendants No. Civ.A.3:04CV-231-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, At Louisville. April 29, 2004. Order Granting Permanent Injunction July 22, 2004.

CROW, Presiding Judge. Defendant, Brett L. Albarado, tried as a prior offender, § 558.016.2, RSMo 1994, was found guilty by a jury of stealing telephone services by deceit in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1994.1 The trial court sentenced Defendant to four years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals, complaining about jury instructions, admission of evidence, and the alleged insuffic

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant’s conviction and sentence be affirmed

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: The defendants-appellants Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al. (collectively the “Rail Carriers”) appeal the district court’s order remanding this case to the state court from which it was removed. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that we are without jurisdiction and therefore dismiss the appeal.

787 So.2d 431 (2001) Thomas ALBARADO v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Thomas Albarado, et al. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, et al. Nos. 2000-C-2540, 2000-C-2550, 2000-C-2555, 2000-C-2556, 2000-C-2560, and 2000-C-2578. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. April 25, 2001. Opinion Granting Rehearing May 31, 2001.

OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge. Christian Hartwell set off a metal detector at a security checkpoint in an airport. Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) agents then used a magnetic wand to pinpoint any metal on his person. They detected something in Hartwell’s pocket and asked to see it. Ultimately, they discovered that the object wa

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-30243 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-03-00450-RSL SERGIO RAMON MARQUEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-30243 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-00450-RSL SERGIO RAMON MARQUEZ, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

296 F.Supp.2d 596 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Christian HARTWELL. Criminal Action No. 03-384. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 22, 2003. *597 *598 Albert J. Raman, Lawrence R. Watson, II, Rossman D. Thompson, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, P

436 F.3d 174 UNITED STATESv.Christian HARTWELL, Appellant. No. 04-3841. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued May 24, 2005. January 31, 2006. Albert J. Raman (argued), Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. Patrick L. Meehan, Laurie Magid, Robert A. Zau

PER CURIAM. Rufino Falcon entered the country illegally and has previously been deported twice. In May 2002, he was convicted by a jury of drug crimes and his sentence included an enhancement for his leadership role in the enterprise. In July 2002, he pled guilty to an illegal reentry charge *1002brought in a separate complaint, after the district court denied his

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge. Sergio Ramon Marquez was randomly selected for secondary security screening at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and found to be in possession of two kilograms of cocaine lodged underneath his pants. He challenges the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence obtained during this administrative airport search. He questions whether an airport screenin

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 02-3905 & 02-3906 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RUFINO FALCON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of India

SACK, Circuit Judge. Defendant Jose Antonio Casado pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Chief Judge) to possessing cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), and to disobeying a lawful court order in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). Casado con