Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Al-Timimi”
United States v. Ali Al-Timimipublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 14-4451 Doc: 199 Filed: 01/09/2026 Pg: 1 of 31 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-4451 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALI AL-TIMIMI, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the
Al-Timimi v. Jacksonpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 435.
Al-Timimi v. Jacksonpublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Al-Timimi v. Jacksonpublic domain
608 F.Supp.2d 833 (2009) Ali AL-TIMIMI, Petitioner, v. Andrew JACKSON, Respondent. Civil No. 05-10266. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 17, 2009. *835 Larry A. Smith, Southfield, MI, for Petitioner. Laura A. Cook, Michigan Department of Attorney General, Lansing, MI, for Respondent.<
Khan v. United Statespublic domain
Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Before the Court is Masoud Ahmad Khan's ("movant" or "Khan") Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Dkt. No. 849]. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background
United States v. Chandiapublic domain
675 F.3d 329 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ali Asad CHANDIA, a/k/a Abu Qatada, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-4323. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 24, 2012. Decided: April 6, 2012. *331 ARGUED: Marvin David Miller, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. John T
United States v. Amawipublic domain
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Mohammed Zaki AMAWI, et al., Defendant. No. 3:06CR719. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 27, 2008. ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge. This is a criminal case in which the indictment charges the defendants with conspiring to: 1) kill and maim members of the United Stat
United States v. Benkahlapublic domain
530 F.3d 300 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sabri BENKAHLA, Defendant-Appellant. Council on American-Islamic Relations; Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation, Amici Supporting Appellant. No. 07-4778. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued April 11, 2008. Decided June 23, 2008.
United States v. Chandiapublic domain
514 F.3d 365 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ali Asad CHANDIA, a/k/a Abu Qatada, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-4997. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued October 30, 2007. Decided January 23, 2008. *366 *367
United States v. Benkahlapublic domain
501 F.Supp.2d 748 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Sabri BENKAHLA, Defendant. No. 1:06cr9(JCC). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 3, 2007. *749 *750 Gordon D. Kromberg, United States Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff. John A. Keat
United States v. Benkahlapublic domain
437 F.Supp.2d 541 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Sabri BENKAHLA, Defendant. No. 1:06CR9(JCC). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. May 17, 2006. *542 *543 *544 John A. Keats, Law Offices of John A. Keats, Fairfax, VA, for S
United States v. Khanpublic domain
Affirmed in part; remanded in part by published opinion. Judge Duncan wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge Widener joined. Judge Goodwin wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Defendants Masoud Khan (“Khan”), Sei-fullah Chapman (“Chapman”), and Ham-mad Abdur-Raheem (“Hammad”) appeal their convictions after a bench trial on v
United States v. Khanpublic domain
309 F.Supp.2d 789 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Masoud KHAN, et al., Defendants. No. CRIM.03-296-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. Alexandria Division. March 4, 2004. *790 *791 *792 *793
461 F.3d 477 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Masoud Ahmad KHAN, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Seifullah Chapman, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Hammad Abdur-Raheem, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Masoud Ahmad Khan, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Reginald Williams v. Catherine Baumanpublic domain
*633 OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Reginald Williams, who was convicted in Michigan state court for the fatal shooting of the proprietor of a video store during an attempted robbery, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Williams’s petition alleged
Duke v. Allenpublic domain
WILSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Attempting to bolster the credibility of Mark Duke’s cooperating co-defendant, the prosecutor argued the following to the jury: [Duke’s co-defendant] told the truth, ladies and gentlemen, and here is how we know it, there’s a witness that you heard from but he didn’t come in here and talk to you from this witness stand. After
Duke v. Allenpublic domain
641 F.3d 1289 (2011) Mark DUKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard ALLEN, Respondent-Appellee. No. 09-16011. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 26, 2011. *1290 Randall S. Susskind (Court-Appointed), Equal Justice Initiative of AL, Montgomery, AL, for Petitioner-Appellant. J. Thomas Leverette, Montgomery, A
Rio Grande International Study Center v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:19-cv-00408 (TNM) v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs,
Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. v. Obamapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge. SUMMARY OF DECISION Plaintiffs seek an order finding defendants civilly liable to them under section 1810 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”), 50 USC §§ 1801-71, for eavesdropping on their telephone conversations without a FISA warrant. In the course of lengthy proceedings in this court and the
700 F.Supp.2d 1182 (2010) In re NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION. This order pertains to: Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc, an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation; Wendell Belew, a United States Citizen and Attorney at Law; Asim Ghafoor, a Unites States Citizen and Attorney at Law, Plaintiffs, v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States; National Security Agency and Keith B. Alexander, its Director; Office of