Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HACKEL, GROSS, and BLOSSER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Yair R. ACOSTA-FIERROS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700076 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. DANIEL ACOSTA Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Handling) Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Seth Alberto Acosta has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Acosta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record r

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. Carlos Rafael Acosta-Joaquin ("Acosta"), who appeals from his conviction for fraudulent use of a social security number not his own, is a Dominican citizen. He entered the United States illegally sometime in 2005 or 2006, has remained ever since and early adopted the name of a U.S. citizen named Kelvin Valle-Alicea ("Valle"). Following a four-count indictment, <

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to (represent Alexis Acosta-Guzman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Acosta-Guzman has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant po

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Acosta-Estrella has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18. L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Acosta-Estrella has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel Acosta-Nieves has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Acosta-Nieves has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Ernest Acosta has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Acosta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record

807 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan Manuel ACOSTA, Martin Arreola-Romero, Angel Luis Ayala, Otha Barnes, Gerald Edward Durrance, Martina Casas Flores, Ramiro Hernandez-Duque, Jorge Lucatero-Torres, Belisario Gil Mendoza, Juan Manuel Mendoza, Raphael Pedroza Perez, Obiel Pineda-Pardo, Alfonso Rios, Jr., Jose Cesar Almeida, Jorge Alejandro Anaya-Medina, Luis Manuel Haces-Delgado, Alejandro De La Cruz-Plancarte, Javier De La

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Overview Today we deal with the fallout from a deadly drug conspiracy in Puerto Rico involving a small army of criminals affiliated with “the Combo of Dr. Pila” (from now on, “the Combo”), a vicious gang named after a local housing project where members ran one of their many drug points. The five defendants whose joint trial led to these consolidated appeals are Acosta, Fournier,

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Enrique Garcia Rossell Acosta (Acosta) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Acosta has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jonathan Enrique Acosta-Corralco seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B

619 F.3d 956 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Samuel ACOSTA, Appellant. No. 08-3086. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 13, 2010. Filed: August 31, 2010. *958 Kent A. Gummert, argued, West Des Moines, IA, for appellant. Craig Payton Gaumer, AUSA, argued, Des Moines,

MEMORANDUM ** Andrew Acosta appeals his conviction and sentence for robbing the same bank twice in twelve days. We affirm. Acosta challenges the sufficiency of the evidence showing that the bank was federally insured. “The law is clear that the uncontradicted testimony of a bank employee on the issue of FDIC insurance is sufficient to support a jury’s finding of that element.” United

656 F.3d 1109 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar ACOSTA-GALLARDO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-8075. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. August 30, 2011. *1112 Chris T. Rasmussen, Rasmussen & Kang, Las Vegas, NV, for the Appellant. Stephanie I. Sprecher, Assistant United States Atto

MEMORANDUM ** Andrew Acosta appeals his conviction and sentence for robbing the same bank twice in twelve days. We affirm. Acosta challenges the sufficiency of the evidence showing that the bank was federally insured. “The law is clear that the uncontradicted testimony of a bank employee on the issue of FDIC insurance is sufficient to support a jury’s finding of that element.” United

595 F.Supp.2d 282 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ramon ACOSTA, a/k/a "Arsenio Rodriguez," a/k/a "Juicy," and Manuel Melo, a/k/a "Gago," Defendants. No. 07 Cr. 1150 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 16, 2009. *284 Michael Quinn English, United States Attorney, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM ** Hector Acosta appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Acosta contends that his counsel was inef

768 F.Supp.2d 365 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Felix ACOSTA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant. Criminal No. 11-180M (JA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 3, 2011. Rosaida J. Melendez-Rivera, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Attorneys Office, Hato Rey, PR, for Plaintiff. Hector E. Guzman-Silva, Federal Public Defender's Office,

534 F.3d 574 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicolas J. ACOSTA, Ernesto Estrada III, Gregorio M. Acosta, Jr., Jorge N. Barragan, Jr., Pedro Zamora, Florentino Castillo, Donald K. Fairbanks, and Robert G. Smith, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 06-1519, 06-1757, 06-1777, 06-1801, 06-1963, 06-2268, 06-2333, 06-2594. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.