Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. AHMAD”
United States v. Ahmad Rhodespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2829 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Ahmad Rashad Rhodes, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appella
United States v. Ahmad Abouammopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10348 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cr-00621- v. EMC-1 AHMAD ABOUAMMO, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Cour
United States v. Ahmad Hashimipublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7190 Doc: 61 Filed: 08/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-7190 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AHMAD SAYED HASHIMI, a/k/a Jimmy, a/k/a Jimmy Jimski, a/k/a Jamshaid,
United States v. Ahmad McAdorypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-30112 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cr-00199-RSM-1 AHMAD JEROME MCADORY, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief District Judge, Pr
United States v. Ahmad Rashadpublic domain
PER CURIAM. *955 Ahmad Rashad appeals the district court's denial of an 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) sentence reduction based upon Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782
United States v. Ahmadpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Hakim Ibn Ahmad has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ahmad has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
United States v. Ahmadpublic domain
ORDER Hussnian Ahmad falsely represented that he was a victim of Hurricane Katrina and fraudulently received over $6,000 in cash and lodging from the Federal Emergency Management Agency in September 2005. He pleaded guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement to one count of theft of government funds. See 18 U.S.C. § 641. The district court calculated a guidelines range of 2 to 8 months’ imprisonment, but at sentencing Ahm
United States v. Ahmadpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Issam Ahmad Suliman Abu Laila (“Suliman”) appeals his conviction and sentence for fraud relating to identification documents, access devices, and an application for a passport. He contends that the search warrants for his apartment, storage unit, and two computers were not supported by probable cause, and that the officer’s reliance on the warrants did not fall within the “good-faith” exceptio
United States v. Ahmadpublic domain
Reversed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge WILLIAMS joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: In this in rem civil action the government appeals an order denying forfeiture of the defendant funds. The government contends that some of the funds were used to st
United States v. Ahmadpublic domain
992 F.Supp. 682 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, v. Iftekhar AHMAD, Defendant. No. 97 CRIM. 1168 LAK. United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 9, 1998. *683 Eric Seidel, Assistant United States Attorney, Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, New York City, for U.S. Robert S. Wolf, New York City, for Iftekhar
United States v. Ahmadpublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ No. 95-20627 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS ATTIQUE AHMAD, Defendant-Appell
United States v. Ahmad Ghafooripublic domain
106 F.3d 387 U.S.v.Ahmad Ghafoori NO. 96-5326 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Dec 24, 1996 Appeal From: D.N.J. , No. 96-cr-00099 1 AFFIRMED.
United States v. Syed Ahmadpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3490 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SYED F. AHMAD, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court
United States v. Ahmad Mickenspublic domain
53 F.3d 329NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,v.Ahmad MICKENS, Defendant--Appellant. No. 93-5959. United States Court of
United States v. Ahmad R. Shayestehpublic domain
166 F.3d 349 98 CJ C.A.R. 5970 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
United States v. Ahmad R. Shayestehpublic domain
161 F.3d 19 98 CJ C.A.R. 5207 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, o
Ahmad v. United States (In re Ahmad)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Ashely M. Chan, United States Bankruptcy Judge The United States of America, Social Security Administration (“SSA”) has moved to dismiss the complaint (“Complaint”) of Yusuf Ali Ahmad (“Debtor”) filed in the above-captioned adversary proceeding pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) as incorporated by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012 (“Dismissal Motion”).
United States v. Ahmadpublic domain
869 F.2d 1500 U.S.v.Ahmad* NO. 88-5601 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. FEB 16, 1989 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Issued March 10, 2023 No. 22-1097 ALI HAMZA AHMAD SULIMAN AL BAHLUL, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 22-1173 On Motion to Disqualify KATSAS, Circuit Judge: The Department of Defense has detained
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 22, 2023 Decided July 25, 2023 No. 22-1097 ALI HAMZA AHMAD SULIMAN AL BAHLUL, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 22-1173 On Petitions for Review from the United States Court of Military Commission