Cases

PER CURIAM: The United States -^rought this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama against the defendants Beaird Coal. Company (Beaird Coal) and Cordova Clay Company (Cordova Clay) seeking reclamation fees on coal extracted by the defendants’ mining operations in Walker County, Alabama during the first quarter of 1979 through the second

OPINION KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. An Administrative Law Judge awarded disability benefits to James Adams, formerly a coal miner for A & E Coal Company. See generally Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. The Department of Labor’s Benefits Review Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision. A & E Coal Compa

647 F.Supp. 268 (1986) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. E & C COAL COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 82-0259-B. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division. October 17, 1986. *269 David W. McNabb, Asst. U.S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff. Lewey K. Lee, Wise, Va., for defendan

Restani, Judge: This action is a challenge to the Department of Commerce ("Commerce")'s remand redetermination of the final results of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China ("PRC"). Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand Order in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States , Consol. C

Musgrave, Senior Judge: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China ("PRC"), 80 Fed. Reg. 32344 (June 8, 2015) (final antidumping duty administrative review of 2012-13 period) (" Final Results "), as explained by its accompanying issues and decision memorandum, Public Rec

Musgrave, Senior Judge: This opinion concerns the November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014 period of review ("POR") of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades ("DSBs") and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China ("PRC"). DSBs and Parts Thereof From the PRC ,

Barnett, Judge: *1286 In this consolidated action, Plaintiffs New Mexico Garlic Growers Coalition and El Bosque Farms (collectively "NMGGC"), Consolidated Plaintiff, Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. ("QTF"), and Plaintiff-Intervenors, Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export C

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

OPINION & ORDER FUTEY, Judge. These cases come before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed in all of the above-captioned cases. Plaintiffs are coal producers that believe fees they paid violate the Export Clause of the Constitution. The Court had stayed the cases pending resolution of Consolidation Coal Company v. United States, No. 01-254

615 F.3d 1378 (2010) CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Consol of Pennsylvania Coal Company, Consol of Kentucky Inc., Eighty Four Mining Company, Helvetia Coal Company, Island Creek Coal Company, Kent Coal Mining Company, Keystone Coal Mining Corporation, Laurel Run Mining Company, McElroy Coal Company, Nineveh Coal Company, Quarto Mining Company, Eagle Energy, Inc., Elk Run Coal Company, Inc., Goals Coal Company, Green Valley Coal Company, Independence Coal Co

528 F.3d 1344 (2008) CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Consol of Pennsylvania Coal Company, Consol of Kentucky Inc., Eighty Four Mining Company, Helvetia Coal Company, Island Creek Coal Company, Kent Coal Mining Company, Keystone Coal Mining Corporation, Laurel Run Mining Company, McElroy Coal Company, Nineveh Coal Company, Quarto Mining Company, Eagle Energy, Inc., Elk Run Coal Company, Inc., Goals Coal Company, Green Valley Coal Company, Independence Coal Co

LIVELY, Chief Judge. In this case we hold that a debtor, rehabilitated through Chapter XI bankruptcy proceedings, remains liable to the United States for post-petition interest on delinquent “abandoned mine reclamation fees.” (Post-petition interest is that which accrues after bankruptcy proceedings are commenced.) Before reaching this conclusion it was necessary to determine

Case: 22-1929 Document: 80 Page: 1 Filed: 08/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DARBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1929 ______________________ Appeal from the Un

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3145 LITTLE SANDY COAL COMPANY, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Tax Cour

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3145 LITTLE SANDY COAL COMPANY, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Tax Cour

MEMORANDUM OPINION Tracey N. Wise, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wrigley’s 7-711, Inc.’s, (“Wrigley” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 25 (“Motion”) ] and supporting Memorandum [ECF No. 25-1 (“Memorandum”) ]. In her First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 27 (“Amended Complaint” or “AC”)], Plaintiff Phaedra Spradlin, chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”),

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3145 LITTLE SANDY COAL COMPANY, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Tax Cour

PROST, Circuit Judge. Appellants (collectively “the coal producers”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction their complaints seeking damages in the amount of reclamation fees imposed and paid pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamations Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Consolidation Coal Co. v. United States, 54 Fed.Cl. 14 (2002). Becau

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge In 2010, plaintiff Mingo Logan Coal Company, Inc. filed this lawsuit, challenging the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) decision to withdraw its specification of two locations designated in Mingo Logan’s Clean Water Act permit as disposal sites for the fill material generated by the

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2194 SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN STEWARDS; APPALACHIAN VOICES; SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. RED RIVER COAL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of