⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. 94.59 Acres of Land, More or Less”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000-01-20 · Published · cited 41× · 204 F.3d 698; 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20300; 49 ERC (BNA) 1961; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 735; 2000 WL 38446
204 F.3d 698 (6th Cir. 2000) United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.150 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located in Medina County, Ohio,Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-3160 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: April 29, 1999Decided and Filed: January 20, 2000 Appeal from the United Stat
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978-03-16 · Published · cited 0× · 447 F. Supp. 844; 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19004
MEMORANDUM HERMAN, District Judge. This is a land condemnation case involving 67.59 acres of land situated in Hunting-don County, Pennsylvania, which the United States Government acquired from the Condemnees, Daniel C. Morningstar and his wife, Martha Morningstar, for part of the Government’s Raystown Lake Project. The case was tried before a jury, and on September 28,1977, the jury returned a verdict in
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978-03-27 · Published · cited 22× · 576 F.2d 983; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12000
576 F.2d 983 UNITED STATES of Americav.564.54 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, situated IN MONROE ANDPIKE COUNTIES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, and Benedict F.Pastorini, et al., Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod ofLutheran Camp of America.Appeal of SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA SYNOD OF LUTHERAN CAMP OF AMERICA. No. 77-1238. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976-04-26 · Published · cited 2× · 415 F. Supp. 544
415 F.Supp. 544 (1976) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. 67.59 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN HUNTINGDON COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 75-692. United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania. April 26, 1976. *545 *546 S. John Cottone, U. S. Atty., M
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980-05-05 · Published · cited 33× · 616 F.2d 762; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17853
616 F.2d 762 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.101.88 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN ST. MARYPARISH, STATE OF LOUISIANA, and John M. Singletonet al., and unknown owners, Defendants,Avoca, Incorporated, a Louisiana Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 77-2768. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 5, 1980.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 263 F. Supp. 608; 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9307
MEMORANDUM OPINION OREN HARRIS, District Judge. This is a suit whereby the defendants Hudgens Jeter, Joy H. Jeter, W. S. Jeter and Betty W. Jeter, and defendants Modie D. Morgan and Ora Mae Morgan are contestants and claiming rights to an entitlement of certain lands in a condemnation proceeding by the United States of *609America under power of em
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972-12-06 · Published · cited 35× · 468 F.2d 1261
468 F.2d 1261 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, Cross-Appellee,v.100 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MARIN COUNTY, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, and Drake's Beach Estates, Inc., acorporation, et al., Appellees, Cross-Appellants. Nos. 26483, 26531. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Sept. 25, 1972.Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1972.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976-09-13 · Published · cited 1× · 538 F.2d 670; 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7160
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The Government here pursues an appeal from a judgment based upon a jury determination of value in this action to condemn a sixty-two acre tract along the perimeter of the Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir in Jasper County, Texas. At issue is whether the trial judge properly found the landowner entitled to compensation for the value which had accrued by the t
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982-02-08 · Published · cited 6× · 671 F.2d 313; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21992; 10 Fed. R. Serv. 232
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves issues raised with the district court’s actions in conducting a condemnation jury trial. The United States filed its Complaint in Condemnation January 5, 1979, against the subject property of this litigation, a body of land near Tacoma, Washington, which was owned by the Tacoma Duck Club, Inc. The property was acquired for inclu
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979-10-31 · Published · cited 202× · 605 F.2d 762; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10811
*768 JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge: The Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which provides that private property shall not be taken without just compensation, is one of the most basic constitutional guarantees that the rights of the individual will not be unfairly sacrificed in the pursuit of th
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 425 F. Supp. 929; 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15937
MEMORANDUM ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge. This is an action for review of a condemnation award pursuant to Rules 71A(h) and 53(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Commission appointed by the Court under Rule 71A(h) viewed the property and heard four days of proof on the question of just compensation. In a report filed on November 21,1975, the Commission found that the landowners suffere
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971-09-16 · Published · cited 15× · 446 F.2d 1030
DYER, Circuit Judge: “Facts relevant to this title dispute have been developing since Jean Lafitte was appointed Governor of Galveston Island in 1819 by the Republic of Mexico.” 1 One hundred and forty years later, in 1959, the United States brought suit to remove cloud a
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962-07-10 · Published · cited 2× · 30 F.R.D. 512; 6 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 659; 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6012
JOHN E. MILLER, Chief Judge. Certain defendant landowners in each of the above cases have filed identical motions for production, inspection and copying of documents along with identical interrogatories to be answered by plaintiff, and have submitted brief in support of the motions and the interrogatories. The plaintiff has filed identical objections to the interrogatories and to the motions for productio
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 589 F. Supp. 2d 1349; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107437; 2008 WL 5155741
(2008) UNITED STATES of America upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF-WAY OVER A TOTAL OF 15.69 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN GORDON COUNTY, GEORGIA, Janie Sue Caudle, individually and as co-executor of the estates of J.W. Moss, Jr., and Willene R. Moss, also known as Jane Moss Caudle, and Jonathan W. Moss, III, as co-executor of the estates of J.W. Moss, Jr., and Willene R. M
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954-05-06 · Published · cited 3× · 212 F.2d 853; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3455
RIVES, Circuit Judge. In a condemnation proceeding instituted by the United States against ap-pellee, John P. Hall and others, the district court awarded to Hall the sum of $6,500.00 as compensation, “for the diminishment in market value of those certain untaken uplands described as Lots 5, 6 and 7,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959-10-05 · Published · cited 4× · 270 F.2d 707; 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5003
SOPER, Circuit Judge. The principal question in this case is whether an electric power company, which purchased from a riparian owner the right to flood the land, is entitled to any compensation when the United States takes over the right from the power company by condemnation. The owner of the fee in the land, having conveyed the fiowage rights to the power company and thereby de
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-1956 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 08/18/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WILLIAM KING, STEPHEN DARDZINSKI, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ESTATE OF ANTHONY GUGLIUZZA, BY ITS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, ANTHONY A. GUGLIUZZA, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED ST
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 24-CO-0162 UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. DAMAIRZIO M. WELLS,
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims ) ROGER BIRDBEAR, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 16-75L v. ) (Filed: August 14, 2025) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-912 Filed: November 26, 2024 PERRY LOVERIDGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Thomas S. Stewart and Reed W. Ripley, Stewart, Wald & Smith, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs. Kimberly A. Cullen and LeeAnn Kim, Trial