Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. 9 Miscellaneous Firearms and Assorted Ammunition”
Sanders v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 17-CF-0544 & 20-CO-0058 WILLIAM DONNETTE SANDERS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED
United States v. Samuelspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 18-cr-144 (RC/GMH) ) ABDUL K. SAMUELS, )
Tpl, Incorporated v. United Statespublic domain
Jurisdiction; Contract Disputes Act; 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109; Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; Breach of Contract; Impossibility; Impracticability; Mutual Mistake; Unconseionability; Mitigation of Damages; Failure to Raise Defense with Contracting Officer. OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE D. KAPLAN, Judge, U.S. Court of Federal Claims
United States v. Aircraftpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR., District Judge. Before the court is the motion of plaintiff, the United States of America (“United States”), for summary judgment pursuant *1245to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Doc. 22. The United States filed this civil action pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1595a, alleging that the named in rem defendant p
United States v. Demario Densonpublic domain
OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Demario Denson’s sentencing appeal presents two issues. The first is whether a conviction for inciting to violence, see Ohio Rev.Code § 2917.01(A), is a crime of violence under the career-offender provisions of the sentencing guidelines.- - We hold that it is not, but that the facts of Denson’s
United States v. Polizzipublic domain
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Peter POLIZZI, Defendant. No. 06-CR-22 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction.....................................................................
United States v. Sells (Shelby)public domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PU BL ISH March 1, 2007 UNITED STATES COURT O F APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Return of Seized Property v. United Statespublic domain
625 F.Supp.2d 949 (2009) In re RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY, Terri Jordan, et al., Movants/Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent/Defendant. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Assorted Firearms, Motorcycles, et al., Defendants. Terri Jordan, et al., Claimants. Nos. 2:09-cv-459-FMC, 2:09-cv-1887-FMC-JCx. United States District Court, C.D. California.
United States v. Miscellaneous Firearpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-4311 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee-Plaintiff, v. MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS, EXPLOSIVES, DESTRUCTIVE DEVICES AND AMMUNITION, Defendant, APPEAL OF: DONNA FLEISCHLI, Claimant. ____________
United States v. Assorted Firearmspublic domain
201 F.Supp.2d 496 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ASSORTED FIREARMS (John Mowatt, Claimant), Defendant. No. Civ. AMD 01-3701. United States District Court, D. Maryland. Filed: April 29, 2002. *497 Thomas M. DiBiagio, Richard C. Kay, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff. Timothy
United States v. Fifty-Two Firearmspublic domain
362 F.Supp.2d 1308 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. FIFTY-TWO FIREARMS, Defendant. No. 6:04CV1658ORL18JGG. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 10, 2005. *1309 Daniel W. Eckhart, U.S. Attorney's Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff. *1310
United States v. Wickpublic domain
52 F.Supp.2d 1310 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. John WICK, Defendant. No. CR 98-663 MV. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. February 11, 1999. *1311 *1312 Tara Neda, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. Susan Dunleavy, Assistant Public Defen
United States v. Fosterpublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Albert Foster, Jr., was charged in a twelve-count superseding indictment with various violations of Titles 18 and 21 of the United States Code. Each charge was based on evidence seized during a warrant-based search of Foster’s home. In addition to seizing those limited items specifically listed in the search warrant, the officers seized a large number of unlisted items. Foster broug
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. We have combined these separate appeals solely for the purpose of disposition. Between early 2002 and July 2003, Shelby Sells and his son Anthony Sells were engaged in a large-scale methamphetamine manufacturing and distribution operation on Shelby’s property in rural Sequoyah County, Oklahoma. Both were convicted of drug and firearm offenses relating to
United States v. Thao Dinh Lepublic domain
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. On December 12, 1997, after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence, Thao Dinh Le pled guilty to the following offenses: (1) possessing firearms while being a user of unlawful controlled substances, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3); (2) possessing unregistered destructive devices, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d); a
United States v. Rodriguezpublic domain
841 F.Supp. 79 (1994) UNITED STATES of America v. Renaldo RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. No. CR 92-531. United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 3, 1994. *80 Zachary W. Carter, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y. by Alan B. Vickery, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, NY, for U.S. Kalina & Guido by Robert I. Kalina, New York City, for def
99 F.Supp.2d 420 (2000) Hipolito PIMENTEL Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. No. 96Civ.9021(PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 7, 2000. *421 Hipolito Pimentel, Oakdale, LA, pro se. Mary Jo White, U.S. Atty., Sara Thomas, of counsel, New York City, for Defendant.
OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. The United States brought this civil in rem forfeiture action, under 18 U.S.C. *417 § 924(d), for the forfeiture of ninety-three firearms involved in a § 922(g)(1) violation, nearly five years after the property originally wa
United States v. 57 Miscellaneous Firearmspublic domain
422 F.Supp. 1066 (1976) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. 57 MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS, Defendant. No. 73 CV 649-W-4. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D. November 19, 1976. *1067 J. Whitfield Moody, First Asst. U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff. Charles C. Shafer, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for de
State v. Garnettpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 45282 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, December 2018 Term ) v. ) Filed: February 20, 2019