Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. 2606 High Street”
United States v. Clarkepublic domain
767 F.Supp.2d 12 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Zion CLARKE, Ricardo DeFour, Kevon Demerieux, Anderson Straker, Wayne Pierre, Christopher Sealey, and Kevin Nixon, Defendants. Criminal No. 06-102 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 2, 2011. *17 Bruce R. Hegyi, Jeanne Marie Hauch, Emily A. Miller,
United States v. Strakerpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal No. 06-102 (JDB) ZION CLARKE, RICARDO DEFOUR, KEVON DEMERIEUX, ANDERSON STRAKER, WAYNE PIERRE, CHRISTOPHER SEALEY, and KEVIN NIXON, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINIO
Salem Financial, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured Transaction Between BB & T Bank and Bar-clays Bank; Availability of Foreign Tax Credits From Payment of United Kingdom Taxes; Deductions for Interest and Transaction Costs; Economic Substance Doctrine Applied to Trust and Loan Components of Transaction; Assessment of Penalties. OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. In this tax refund case, t
Salem Financial, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-192T (Filed: September 20, 2013) *********************************** * * SALEM FINANCIAL, INC., * Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured * Transaction Between BB&T Bank and Plaintiff, * Barclays Bank; Availability of Foreign
Salem Financial, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-192T (Filed: September 20, 2013) *********************************** * * SALEM FINANCIAL, INC., * Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured * Transaction Between BB&T Bank and Plaintiff, * Barclays Bank; Availability of Foreign
Starr International Company, Inc v. United Statespublic domain
Government’s Financial Rescue and Takeover of American International Group (AIG); Fifth Amendment Taking and Illegal Exaction Claims; Shareholder Class Action; Demand for Corporate Equity and Voting Control as Consideration for Loan; Section 13(3), Federal Reserve Act; Effect of AIG Board’s Approval of Terms; Damages; Economic Loss Analysis. OPINION AND ORDER
Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United Statespublic domain
Fifth Amendment Taking; Lucas Categorical Taking; Regulatory Taking; Penn Central Factors; Just Compensation; Highest and Best Use of Property; Posttrial Award OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge Plaintiffs Love Terminal Partners, L.P. (“Love Terminal Partners”) and Virginia Aerosp
Corrected In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: October 28, 2022) ********************************** ) Taking via government-induced flooding IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) of private property; post-trial decision on BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) just compensation for six b
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: October 28, 2022) ********************************** ) Taking via government-induced flooding IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) of private property; post-trial decision on BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) just compensation for six bellwether CONTROL RESERVOIRS
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: Plaintiff, Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. (Northrop), brings this action seeking damages for the alleged breach of an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.2 Under that agree*653ment, Northrop leased surveillance software to IC
Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
*716 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This ease, the first of the Iraq war contract cases to proceed to trial in the United States Court of Federal Claims, involves a claim for the provision of dining facility (“DFAC”) services for the United States Army (the “Army”) at Camp Anaconda, one of the largest United States
United States v. Diazpublic domain
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
United States v. Diazpublic domain
DOWD, District Judge: I. Introduction This appeal follows the conviction of the six appellants, Gloria Diaz (“Diaz”), Jose *1074 Bias Lopez (“Lopez”), Sergio Echevarria (“Echevarria”), Eladio Munoz (“Munoz”), Orestes Hernandez (“Orestes Hernandez”) and Ismae
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
United States v. Reinholdpublic domain
20 F.Supp.2d 541 (1998) UNITED STATES of America v. Isaac REINHOLD, Josef Goldstein, a/k/a "Yossie Goldstein," a/k/a "Joseph Goldstein," Irving Goldstein, Michael Mendlovic, Herbert Greenfield, United Talmudical Academy of Boro Park, Defendants. No. (S2) 97 CR. 686 (AGS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 2, 1998. *
Foster v. United Statespublic domain
922 F.Supp. 642 (1996) P. Wesley FOSTER, Jr., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, General Services Administration, and District of Columbia, Defendants. Civ. No. 95-722 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 29, 1996. *643 *644 *645</
OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT This opinion relates to four consolidated cases filed by the same plaintiff, Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. (Gulf Group), in the United States Court of Federal Claims. 1 The eases arise from four
United States v. Bertolipublic domain
854 F.Supp. 975 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard O. BERTOLI, Defendant. Cr. No. 89-218. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 30, 1994. *976 *977 *978 *979
Lockett v. United Statespublic domain
938 F.2d 630 33 ERC 1609, 60 USLW 2107, 22 Envtl.L. Rep. 20,216 Willie Mae LOCKETT, George R. Jackson, Thelma Y. Jackson,Nathaniel Johnson, Sylvester McQueen, Dorothy L. McQueen,Linnon Nixon, Edith Nixon, Ada Partlow, Luther Wiggins, IraL. Wilson, Kevin L. Carter, Joanne Davis, Cynthia Davis,Ronald Davis, Henry Dillard, Lucy Bell Dillard, AlbertNicholson, Annie J. Torry, and Charles White, Plaint
348 F.Supp.2d 398 (2004) Carmen THOMPSON, et al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants No. CIV.A. MJG-95-309. United States District Court, D. Maryland. January 6, 2005. *404 Andrew David Freeman, Brown, Goldstein and Levy LLP, Susan Goering, Barbara A. Samuels, Eleanor Montgomery